首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computers in mathematics and science teaching >Does Type Matter: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Four-Function and Graphing Calculators
【24h】

Does Type Matter: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Four-Function and Graphing Calculators

机译:类型是否重要:评估四功能和图形计算器的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Calculators are a controversial, yet widely used tool in mathematics education for all students and especially for students with disabilities. However, little research has explored calculators and students with disabilities. This paper explored the influence of calculator type (four-function and graphing) on the mathematical performance of eighth-grade students with and without disabilities through a pretest-posttest design. In the split plot analysis, a significant main effect for condition (four-function vs. graphing calculator) was not found, suggesting that type of calculator did not impact student performance. Student self-reported survey responses regarding use and perception of calculators are also analyzed and reported; few statistically significant differences were found in the survey results between students with and without disabilities.
机译:对于所有学生,特别是对于残疾学生,计算器是有争议的但在数学教育中广泛使用的工具。但是,很少有研究探索计算器和残疾学生。本文通过前测后测设计,探讨了计算器类型(四功能和图形)对八年级有无残疾学生的数学成绩的影响。在分割图分析中,未发现条件(四功能与图形计算器)的显着主要影响,这表明计算器的类型不会影响学生的表现。还对学生关于计算器使用和感知的自我报告调查回答进行了分析和报告;残疾学生与非残疾学生之间的调查结果中,几乎没有统计学上的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号