...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Community Health >Promotoras as Mental Health Practitioners in Primary Care: A Multi-Method Study of an Intervention to Address Contextual Sources of Depression
【24h】

Promotoras as Mental Health Practitioners in Primary Care: A Multi-Method Study of an Intervention to Address Contextual Sources of Depression

机译:Promotoras作为初级保健中的心理健康从业者:解决抑郁症情境来源的干预措施的多方法研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We assessed the role of promotoras—briefly trained community health workers—in depression care at community health centers. The intervention focused on four contextual sources of depression in underserved, low-income communities: underemployment, inadequate housing, food insecurity, and violence. A multi-method design included quantitative and ethnographic techniques to study predictors of depression and the intervention’s impact. After a structured training program, primary care practitioners (PCPs) and promotoras collaboratively followed a clinical algorithm in which PCPs prescribed medications and/or arranged consultations by mental health professionals and promotoras addressed the contextual sources of depression. Based on an intake interview with 464 randomly recruited patients, 120 patients with depression were randomized to enhanced care plus the promotora contextual intervention, or to enhanced care alone. All four contextual problems emerged as strong predictors of depression (chi square, p < .05); logistic regression revealed housing and food insecurity as the most important predictors (odds ratios both 2.40, p < .05). Unexpected challenges arose in the intervention’s implementation, involving infrastructure at the health centers, boundaries of the promotoras’ roles, and “turf” issues with medical assistants. In the quantitative assessment, the intervention did not lead to statistically significant improvements in depression (odds ratio 4.33, confidence interval overlapping 1). Ethnographic research demonstrated a predominantly positive response to the intervention among stakeholders, including patients, promotoras, PCPs, non-professional staff workers, administrators, and community advisory board members. Due to continuing unmet mental health needs, we favor further assessment of innovative roles for community health workers.
机译:我们评估了简短的社区卫生工作者promotoras在社区卫生中心的抑郁症治疗中的作用。干预措施的重点是服务不足的低收入社区的四种抑郁状况,即就业不足,住房不足,粮食不安全和暴力。多方法设计包括定量和人种学技术,以研究抑郁症及其干预措施的预测指标。经过结构化的培训计划后,初级保健从业者(PCP)和promotoras共同遵循一种临床算法,其中PCP处方药和/或安排心理健康专业人员和promotoras进行会诊以解决抑郁症的背景因素。根据对464名随机招募的患者的入院访谈,将120名抑郁症患者随机分为加强护理加Promotora情境干预或单独加强护理。所有这四个背景问题都是抑郁症的有力预测指标(卡方,p <.05); Logistic回归显示,住房和粮食不安全是最重要的预测指标(几率均为2.40,p <.05)。干预措施的实施带来了意想不到的挑战,涉及卫生中心的基础设施,激励者角色的界限以及医疗助手的“草皮”问题。在定量评估中,干预措施并未导致抑郁的统计学显着改善(优势比4.33,置信区间重叠1)。人种学研究表明,利益相关者(包括患者,promotoras,PCP,非专业工作人员,管理人员和社区顾问委员会)对干预措施的反应主要是积极的。由于仍未满足心理健康需求,我们赞成进一步评估社区卫生工作者的创新角色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号