首页> 外文学位 >Allocation of health care resources at the point of care: An exploratory study of the perceptions and decision making of nurse practitioners delivering primary care services in community clinics.
【24h】

Allocation of health care resources at the point of care: An exploratory study of the perceptions and decision making of nurse practitioners delivering primary care services in community clinics.

机译:在护理点分配医疗资源:对社区诊所提供初级护理服务的执业护士的看法和决策的探索性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Little is known about the influence of practice site resource scarcities on the clinical decision making of nurse practitioners. This descriptive study explored nurse practitioners' perceptions of practice site scarcities, the strategies used to allocate scarce resources, and the ethical difficulties experienced in doing so. The survey instrument was developed by Hurst et al. (2006). The theory of naturalistic decision making (Klein, 1989, 1993) and the Recognition Primed Decision model (2008) provided the conceptual framework.;Nurse practitioners and nurse practitioner students practicing in community clinics in 22 Ohio counties completed the electronic survey (N=68, response rate 27.9%, mean age 44.9 years, mean number of years in NP practice 10.7 years, 90% of NP's held prescriptive privileges, 72% were clinic employees, 69% provided adult primary care services, 30% provided pediatric services, and 95% of the clinics provided indigent care).;Practice site resource scarcities were reported by 41%. "Compromised decision making" and "care impacted by the inability to pay for services" were themes emerging from the examples of the ethical issues described by nurse practitioners in narratives. Pharmaceuticals (31%), mental health services (31%) and referrals to specialists (27%), were the services most frequently unavailable, most difficult to obtain, and most often not provided for patients. The most frequently used strategies to manage resource scarcities were substitution of another option (34%) and explanation of why the service could not be provided (44%). Poor efficacy of a therapy (85%), small marginal benefit (78%), short life expectancy (49%), and age > 85 years (47%) were the most frequently identified criteria for not providing services. This study found evidence of practice site resource scarcities resulting in ethical dilemmas for nurse practitioners providing primary care services in community clinics.
机译:关于实践场所资源稀缺对护士执业医师临床决策的影响知之甚少。这项描述性研究探讨了执业护士对工作场所稀缺性的认识,分配稀缺资源的策略以及这样做所遇到的道德困难。该调查仪器由Hurst等人开发。 (2006)。自然决策理论(Klein,1989,1993)和认知主导决策模型(2008)提供了概念框架。;在俄亥俄州22个县的社区诊所执业的护士和护士从业者完成了电子调查(N = 68 ,回应率27.9%,平均年龄44.9岁,在NP行医的平均年限10.7年,NP中拥有90%的处方特权,72%为诊所员工,69%提供成人初级保健服务,30%提供儿科服务以及95%的诊所提供了贫困护理。);据报告有41%的实践场所资源短缺。护理从业人员在叙述中描述的道德问题实例中出现了“决策失误”和“因无法支付服务而受到影响的护理”的主题。药品(31%),精神卫生服务(31%)和转诊给专家(27%)是最不可用,最难获得且最不为患者提供的服务。管理资源稀缺的最常用策略是替换另一种选择(34%),并解释为什么不能提供服务(44%)。不提供服务的最常见标准是治疗效果差(85%),边际收益小(78%),预期寿命短(49%)和年龄大于85岁(47%)。这项研究发现了实践场所资源稀缺的证据,导致在社区诊所提供初级保健服务的执业护士面临道德困境。

著录项

  • 作者

    Crowe, Mary Lind.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Akron.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Akron.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Nursing.;Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 175 p.
  • 总页数 175
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号