首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cognition and Development >Learning Count Nouns and Adjectives: Understanding the Contributions of Lexical Form Class and Social-Pragmatic Cues
【24h】

Learning Count Nouns and Adjectives: Understanding the Contributions of Lexical Form Class and Social-Pragmatic Cues

机译:学习数词名词和形容词:理解词汇形式课堂和社会语用线索的贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In two experiments, one hundred ninety-two 3-year-olds, 4-year-olds, and adults heard a novel word for a target object and then were asked to extend the label to one of two test objects, one matching in shape-based object category (the shape match) and the other matching in a property other than shape (the property match). We independently manipulated the lexical form class cues (count noun, adjective) and social-pragmatic cues (point actions, property-highlighting actions) accompanying the label. The impact of these two types of cue on extension differed markedly across age groups. Adults and 4-year-olds extended the word to the property match significantly more often when the term was modeled as an adjective and when it was presented with property-highlighting actions; but adults extended both adjectives and count nouns systematically to the property match when the speaker highlighted the non-shape property, whereas 4-year-olds systematically extended only adjectives to the property match under these conditions. Three-year-olds extended the word to the property match significantly more often when the label was modeled as an adjective but were not significantly affected by the social-pragmatic cues; and they failed to extend either adjectives or count nouns systematically to the property match when the speaker highlighted the non-shape property. We discuss the results in terms of the proposal that word learning draws on cues from multiple sources and the nature of the “shape bias” in lexical development.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15248370903453592
机译:在两个实验中,一百九十二个三岁,四岁和成人听到了一个新颖的单词来表示目标物体,然后被要求将标签扩展到两个测试物体中的一个,形状匹配基于对象的类别(形状匹配),以及形状以外的其他属性匹配(属性匹配)。我们独立地操纵了带有标签的词汇形式类提示(计数名词,形容词)和社会语用提示(指向动作,强调属性的动作)。这两种类型的提示对延伸的影响在不同年龄段之间差异显着。当该词被形容词为形容词并且带有突出显示财产的行为时,成人和四岁以下儿童将该词扩展到财产匹配的频率更高。但是,当说话人强调非形属性时,成年人将形容词和名词系统地扩展到属性匹配上,而在这些条件下,四岁的孩子只将形容词系统地扩展到属性匹配上。当标签被形容为形容词时,三岁儿童更频繁地将单词扩展到财产匹配,但不受社交,实用主义暗示的影响很大;当说话者强调非形态属性时,他们没有系统地扩展形容词或名词对属性的匹配。我们根据以下建议讨论结果,即单词学习应从多种来源中汲取线索以及词汇发展中“形状偏差”的性质。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15248370903453592

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号