首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Life cycle assessment of bread from several alternative food networks in Europe
【24h】

Life cycle assessment of bread from several alternative food networks in Europe

机译:欧洲几种替代食品网络中面包的生命周期评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, we used LCA to test the influence of practicing low-input farming, on-farm processing and direct distribution on the environmental impact of bread consumption. Primary data were collected from four commercially active producers (two in France, one in Italy and one in Portugal) who cultivate cereals under low levels of inputs, process grains on farm and distribute their products directly to end consumers. Environmental impacts of products were compared to equivalents from supermarkets, characterised by higher rates of applied inputs at the agricultural stage, industrial processing and centralised distribution. The scope of LCA was from cradle to the consumer. The study revealed a high variability of results between individual cases. At the agricultural stage, products from a low-input cropping system integrated with livestock production in France and from a small-scale labour intensive production in Portugal showed similar or better performance on most impact categories to those from high-input agriculture, while horse farming in France and a stockless cultivation of ancient wheat cultivars in Italy revealed mostly higher environmental burdens. Decentralised processing and distribution in France had similar or slightly higher impacts to conventional supply chains, while Italian and Portuguese cases revealed clearly higher environmental burdens for most impact categories. Results demonstrate that while there might be a positive relationship between the scale and eco-efficiency of processing and distribution, the level of agricultural inputs, yields and transport distances cannot be used as proxies of environmental performance. Products of low-input systems can have much higher, similar or lower impacts to their high-input counterparts due to the influence of site conditions and the management. More research assessing the effectiveness of context-specific management systems is needed as oppose to the generic comparisons between labelling schemes (i.e. organic and conventional farming).
机译:在这项研究中,我们使用LCA来测试低投入农业,农场加工和直接分配对面包消费对环境的影响。原始数据是从四个商业活跃的生产者(法国的两个,意大利的一个和葡萄牙的一个)生产的,这些生产商在低投入水平下种植谷物,在农场加工谷物并将产品直接分发给最终消费者。将产品对环境的影响与超市的同类产品进行了比较,其特点是在农业阶段,工业加工和集中配送方面的投入物利用率更高。 LCA的范围从摇篮到消费者。该研究表明,各个案例之间结果差异很大。在农业阶段,法国的低投入种植系统与牲畜生产相结合的产品以及葡萄牙的小规模劳动密集型生产所产生的产品在大多数影响类别中的表现都与高投入农业和马耕农业相似或更好。在法国和意大利古代小麦栽培种的无库存种植中,大多数环境负荷较高。法国的分散加工和分销对传统供应链的影响与传统供应链相似或略高,而意大利和葡萄牙的案例则表明,大多数影响类别的环境负担明显增加。结果表明,尽管加工和分配的规模与生态效率之间可能存在正相关关系,但农业投入水平,产量和运输距离不能用作环境绩效的代理。由于场地条件和管理的影响,低投入系统的产品对其高投入产品的影响可能更高,相似或更低。与标签计划(即有机耕作和常规耕作)之间的一般比较相反,需要进行更多针对上下文特定管理系统有效性的评估研究。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2015年第1期|104-113|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Life Cycle Assessment Group, Institute for Sustainability Sciences, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland;

    Life Cycle Assessment Group, Institute for Sustainability Sciences, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland;

    Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, 8315 Lindau, Switzerland;

    French National Institute for Agricultural Research, INRA SAD-PAYSAGE 65, rue de St-Brieuc, CS 84215 35042 Rennes, France;

    Life Cycle Assessment Group, Institute for Sustainability Sciences, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Low-input agriculture; Bread; Life Cycle Assessment; Agro-ecology; Alternative food networks;

    机译:低投入农业;面包;生命周期评估;农业生态学;替代性食物网络;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号