...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Response surface parallel optimization of extraction of total phenolics from separate white and red grape skin mixtures with microwave- assisted and conventional thermal methods
【24h】

Response surface parallel optimization of extraction of total phenolics from separate white and red grape skin mixtures with microwave- assisted and conventional thermal methods

机译:响应面平行优化,采用微波辅助和常规热方法从白葡萄和红葡萄皮混合物中提取总酚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) was compared with conventional thermal extraction (CTE) to find optimal conditions to maximize total phenolic (TP) content and colour CIELAB C*, separately from white and red skin mixtures of six common grape cultivars each. Five factors were modelled in preliminary and advanced screenings and response surface (RS) optimization followed by the model validation. Optimized and practically acceptable levels of the factors were identified. For white skin those levels were: 60% ethanol content, 6.6 mL/g grape skins liquid to solid ratio, 70 degrees C temperature, pH 1.5, time of extraction 4 min and 60 min for MAE and CTE, respectively. Correspondingly, for red skin mixtures 70% ethanol content, 6.6 mL/g grape skins liquid to solid ratio, 60 degrees C temperature, pH 1.5, time of extraction 4 min and 60 min for MAE and CTE. The model validation experiment confirmed the reproducibility of extraction at the levels identified. Efficiency of TP extraction was comparable between MAE and CTE for both white and red skins. The colour difference between MAE and CTE was noticeable for white skins only. This research presents a novel comparison of two rival industrial methods in application to phenolics extraction from grape skins, when both methods are optimized to extract maximum TP from the same biological material and with the same solvent. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:将微波辅助提取(MAE)与常规热提取(CTE)进行比较,以找到最佳条件,以使总酚(TP)含量和颜色CIELAB C *最大化,而这与六个普通葡萄品种的白皮和红皮混合物分开进行。在初步和高级筛选以及响应面(RS)优化和模型验证中对五个因素进行了建模。确定了因素的优化水平和实际可接受水平。对于白皮,这些含量为:60%乙醇含量,6.6 mL / g葡萄皮液固比,70摄氏度温度,pH 1.5,MAE和CTE的萃取时间分别为4分钟和60分钟。相应地,对于红色皮肤混合物,乙醇含量为70%,葡萄皮液固比为6.6 mL / g,温度为60℃,pH为1.5,MAE和CTE的萃取时间为4分钟和60分钟。模型验证实验证实了在确定水平上提取的可重复性。对于白皮肤和红皮肤,TP提取的效率在MAE和CTE之间是可比的。 MAE和CTE之间的颜色差异仅对于白色皮肤才明显。当两种方法都经过优化以从相同生物材料和相同溶剂中提取最大TP时,本研究提出了两种竞争性工业方法在葡萄皮中酚提取中的新颖比较。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号