...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Strategic resource commitment of high-technology firms An international comparison
【24h】

Strategic resource commitment of high-technology firms An international comparison

机译:高科技公司的战略资源投入国际比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study investigates the dynamics of three strategic variables across three countries in the high-technology sector. The variables under investigation are research and development (R&D) expenditure, capital expenditure (CPX), and sales and administrative (S&A) expenditure and the three countries are the US, Japan, and the UK. We estimate the contemporaneous responsiveness of each of the three strategic variables in response to changes in revenues across the three countries. We also test the statistical causality among the three variables as it impacts revenues. Based on our analysis, we observe that the highest R&D intensity is among the US firms in comparison to firms from Japan and UK. American firms maintain R&D intensity at a stable level with an elasticity of one. We find that Japanese firms have the highest R&D elasticity. Japanese firms show the highest intensity in the area of CPX, whereas American firms have the highest elasticity. Our results show a less globally integrated high-tech sector in each country.
机译:这项研究调查了高科技领域三个国家中三个战略变量的动态。调查中的变量是研发(R&D)支出,资本支出(CPX)以及销售和行政(S&A)支出,这三个国家分别是美国,日本和英国。我们估计这三个战略变量中的每一个对三个国家收入变化的同时响应能力。我们还测试了三个变量之间的统计因果关系,因为这会影响收入。根据我们的分析,我们发现与日本和英国的公司相比,美国公司的研发强度最高。美国公司将研发强度保持在一个稳定水平,弹性为1。我们发现日本公司的研发弹性最高。日本公司在CPX领域表现出最高的强度,而美国公司则具有最高的弹性。我们的结果表明,每个国家的全球高科技产业整合程度都较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号