首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Communication Research >Workplace flexibility and communication flows: a structurational view
【24h】

Workplace flexibility and communication flows: a structurational view

机译:工作场所的灵活性和沟通流程:结构化的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Informed by structuration theory, this study demonstrates how organizational structures - flexibility policies related to worker teleworking - shape communication flows of membership negotiation and activity coordination. Interviews with 53 employees from 2 large Finnish firms revealed that in the organization in which teleworking was permitted workers agentively structured their workdays to use the policy to serve both individual and organizational needs and easily adapted to coworkers' teleworking. By contrast, nearly the opposite was found in the organization that allowed teleworking only by exception; in fact, most did not value teleworking or desire additional flexibility. Through negative discourses about telework, an organizational culture that did not support flexible work was reproduced, maintaining the expectation and effect that organizational activity occurred only at the office. We conclude with practical insights concerning how differences in policies can enable co-creation of differing employee task performance and workplace relationships, and most especially employee views about work-life boundary management.
机译:在结构化理论的指导下,这项研究证明了组织结构-与工人远程办公有关的灵活性政策-如何影响成员协商和活动协调的沟通流程。对来自2家大型芬兰公司的53名员工的采访显示,在允许远程办公的组织中,工人积极地安排工作日,以使用该政策满足个人和组织的需求,并轻松适应同事的远程办公。相比之下,在只允许例外进行远程办公的组织中发现了几乎相反的情况。实际上,大多数人并不看重远程办公,也不希望获得更多的灵活性。通过关于远程办公的负面论述,再现了一种不支持灵活工作的组织文化,从而保持了组织活动仅在办公室发生的期望和效果。我们以有关政策差异如何能够共同创造不同的员工任务绩效和工作场所关系的实践见解作为结论,特别是员工对工作与生活边界管理的看法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号