...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of African American Studies >African American Males’ Student Engagement: A Comparison of Good Practices by Institutional Type
【24h】

African American Males’ Student Engagement: A Comparison of Good Practices by Institutional Type

机译:非洲裔美国男性的学生敬业度:按机构类型对良好作法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Previous college impact studies attempt to estimate the impact of college on African American collegians as a whole. That is, most researchers study Black students as if they represent a monolithic group with similar inputs, experiences, and outcomes. Yet, a growing body of research provides compelling evidence that there are significant within group differences. Using three principles of good practices in undergraduate education defined by Chickering and Gamson (AAHE Bulletin 39:3–7, 1987), this study examined differences in African American males’ (N = 149) engagement by institutional type. A single significant predictor was found; Black men attending master’s institutions have a significant advantage over their counterparts at liberal arts colleges with respect to cooperation among students, controlling for an array of confounding factors. This study provides empirical support for the use of good practices in undergraduate education, particularly among African American men, and has important implications for future practice, policy, and research.
机译:先前的大学影响力研究试图估计大学对整个非洲裔美国人同事的影响。也就是说,大多数研究人员对黑人学生的学习就好像他们代表着一群具有相似的投入,经验和成果的单一群体。然而,越来越多的研究提供了令人信服的证据,证明内部群体差异很大。这项研究使用了Chickering和Gamson(1987年,AAHE公报39:3–7)定义的三项良好的大学实践教学原则,研究了按机构类型划分的非洲裔美国男性(N = 149)参与度的差异。发现了一个重要的预测因子。就学生之间的合作(控制一系列令人困惑的因素)而言,就读于硕士院校的黑人在文理学院中比在文科学院的黑人具有显着优势。这项研究为在本科教育中,特别是在非裔美国人中,对良好实践的使用提供了经验支持,并对未来的实践,政策和研究具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号