首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology >Response Style Differences in the Inattentive and Combined Subtypes of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
【24h】

Response Style Differences in the Inattentive and Combined Subtypes of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

机译:注意缺陷/多动障碍的注意力不集中和联合亚型的反应方式差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examined potential differences between the inattentive and combined ADHD subtypes using laboratory tasks assessing behavioral inhibitory processes. Seventy-five children completed two tasks of behavioral inhibition believed to isolate different processes: the cued reaction time task (CRT), a basic inhibition task, and the goo-go task (GNG), a complex inhibition task that incorporates motivational contingencies. Three groups of participants were identified, including ADHD/Inattentive (n = 17), ADHD/Combined (n = 37), and comparison (n = 21). Results indicated that rather than showing behavioral inhibition deficits, the ADHD/I children appeared overly inhibited, as evidenced by slower reaction times across the two tasks and significantly higher errors of omission in the GNG task. Additionally, the ADHD/I children did not demonstrate cue dependency effects on the CRT task, suggesting that they were failing to incorporate relevant information before making a response. The sluggish and inhibited performance of the ADHD/I group challenges the idea that it is a subtype of ADHD.
机译:这项研究使用评估行为抑制过程的实验室任务,检查了注意力不集中和合并注意力缺陷多动障碍亚型之间的潜在差异。七十五名儿童完成了行为抑制的两个任务,这些任务被认为可以隔离不同的过程:提示反应时间任务(CRT)(基本的抑制任务)和通过/不通过任务(GNG)(包含动机突发事件的复杂抑制任务)。 。确定了三组参与者,包括多动症/注意力不集中(n = 17),多动症/合并(n = 37)和比较(n = 21)。结果表明,ADHD / I儿童没有表现出行为抑制缺陷,而是表现出过度抑制,这通过两个任务的反应时间较慢和GNG任务中的遗漏错误明显更高来证明。此外,ADHD / I的孩子没有表现出对CRT任务的提示依赖性,这表明他们在做出回应之前未能吸收相关信息。 ADHD / I小组的表现呆滞且受抑制,这使人们质疑它是ADHD的一种亚型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号