首页> 外文期刊>Issues in Science and Technology >Lost in Translation: Why Animal Research Fails to Deliver on Its Promise
【24h】

Lost in Translation: Why Animal Research Fails to Deliver on Its Promise

机译:丢失翻译:为什么动物研究无法提供其承诺

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

For 10 years in the early 2000s, 39 researchers across the United States investigated how genes are involved in the human body's response to sepsis, burns, and trauma. When they finished, the researchers struggled to get their study published. Reviewers complained that the investigators had failed to show the same gene response in the "gold standard" for examining such questions: mice models. In response, the team conducted comparable genetic work with mice and were shocked to find there were very few similarities between the responses in mice and humans. For example, the comparatively uniform gene expression found in human response to trauma was not present in mice; in fact, when compared to genes that changed significantly in humans, changes to orthologous genes in mice did not mirror their human targets but were "close to random." Even though responses to burns and acute infections appear similar in mice and humans, the research demonstrated they were underpinned by fundamentally different mechanisms.
机译:2000年代初为10年,美国跨国公司的39名研究人员调查了基因如何参与人体对败血症,烧伤和创伤的反应。当他们完成后,研究人员努力获得他们的学习。审稿人抱怨说,调查人员未能在“黄金标准”中展示相同的基因反应,以检查这些问题:小鼠模型。作为回应,该团队对小鼠进行了可比的遗传工作,并且震惊地发现小鼠和人类的反应之间存在很少有相似之处。例如,小鼠中未存在于人类反应中的相对均匀的基因表达;事实上,与人类显着变化的基因相比,小鼠的原始基因的变化没有反映他们的人体目标,但“接近随机”。尽管对老鼠和人类的燃烧和急性感染的反应类似,但这些研究表明它们是基本上不同的机制基础。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Issues in Science and Technology》 |2021年第4期|30-32|共3页
  • 作者

    JANE JOHNSON;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy at Macquarie University;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号