首页> 外文OA文献 >Decentralisation – A Portmanteau Concept that Promises Much but Fails to Deliver? Comment on “Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis
【2h】

Decentralisation – A Portmanteau Concept that Promises Much but Fails to Deliver? Comment on “Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis

机译:分权化–一个承诺很大但未能实现的波特曼陶概念?评论“斐济卫生服务的权力下放:决策空间分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Decentralisation has been described as an empty concept that lacks clarity. Yet there is an enduring interest in the process of decentralisation within health systems and public services more generally. Many claims about the benefits of decentralisation are not supported by evidence. It may be useful as an organising framework for analysis of health systems but in this context it lacks conceptual clarity and particularly often ignores level context issues given the focus on a principal-agent/vertical centre/local axis or other aspects of limits on autonomy such as standards for professional practice. Both these aspects are relevant in discussing the establishment of “decentralised” health centres in Fiji. In the end decentralisation may be nothing more than a useful descriptive label that can be used in an increasingly wide range of ways but actually have little meaning in practice as an analytical concept.
机译:分权被描述为缺乏明确性的空洞概念。然而,人们更普遍地对卫生系统和公共服务中的权力下放过程感兴趣。许多关于权力下放的好处的主张没有证据支持。它可能是用于分析卫生系统的组织框架,但在这种情况下,它缺乏概念上的清晰性,并且由于侧重于委托人/垂直中心/本地轴或自治限制的其他方面(例如,作为专业实践的标准。这两个方面都与讨论在斐济建立“分散式”医疗中心有关。最终,去中心化不过是有用的描述性标签,可以用越来越多的方式使用,但实际上在实践中作为分析概念没有什么意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Peckham Stephen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号