首页> 外文期刊>International studies of management & organization >Cross-Cultural Management Studies: State of the Field in the Four Research Paradigms
【24h】

Cross-Cultural Management Studies: State of the Field in the Four Research Paradigms

机译:跨文化管理研究:四种研究范式的研究现状

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cross-cultural management research is often confined to the positivist tradition, which is archetypically illustrated by the seminal work of Hofstede. However, this gives an incomplete overview of the field to which three additional research paradigms contribute: interpretivist, postmodern, and critical. Our ambition is to raise awareness of the presence of multiple paradigms in cross-cultural management research. This meta-theoretical positioning allows researchers to consider the insights and contributions from the different paradigms. We aim to achieve this by presenting a brief overview of the state of the field in each paradigm, thus, stressing areas of studies that enrich our understanding of the interaction between culture and management (at the national, organizational, interpersonal, and individual levels). We then highlight the specific contributions of these four paradigms, drawing especially upon the postmodern and critical works, as they have been repeatedly overlooked in reviews. The article concludes by mentioning how more interactions between the paradigms can be developed and can lead to further knowledge development.
机译:跨文化管理研究通常局限于实证主义传统,霍夫斯泰德(Hofstede)的开创性工作从原型上说明了这一点。但是,这并未给出该领域的完整概述,而另外三个研究范式也对该领域做出了贡献:解释主义者,后现代主义者和批判主义者。我们的目标是提高人们对跨文化管理研究中多种范例存在的认识。这种元理论定位使研究人员可以考虑不同范式的见解和贡献。我们旨在通过简要概述每种范式的现状来实现这一目标,从而强调研究领域,以丰富我们对文化与管理之间相互作用的理解(在国家,组织,人际和个人层面) 。然后,我们重点介绍这四个范式的具体贡献,特别是借鉴后现代和批判性作品,因为它们在评论中一再被忽视。文章最后提到了范式之间如何发展更多的相互作用,并可以导致进一步的知识发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号