【24h】

The Decentralisation Debate: Thinking about Power

机译:分权辩论:关于权力的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Comparing the dynamics of centralisation/decentralisation in Belgium and South Africa has the advantage of revealing discrepancies between the public or official rationale for the (re)distribution of power and the probable or eventual effect of this (re)distribution on educational processes and learning outcomes. It can be seen that local empowerment which has been sometimes credited to decentralisation has tended to be rather spurious, for decentralisation instead appears actually to reinforce existing inequities. Using Foucault’s notion of power as complexly relational by nature, the present study explores some of the assumptions underpinning the dynamics of centralisation/decentralisation and the way they are conceived in certain discursive practices. It does so by looking not only at the juridical and administrative distribution of power between the centre and the periphery in education systems, but also at matters of force and governmentality.
机译:比较比利时和南非的集权/分权动态,具有揭示权力(重新)分配的公共或官方理由与这种(重新)分配对教育过程和学习成果的可能或最终影响之间的差异的优势。 。可以看出,有时被认为是权力下放的地方权力往往是虚假的,因为权力下放实际上反而加剧了现有的不平等。本研究使用福柯的权力概念本质上是复杂的关系,它探索了集中化/分散化动力及其在某些话语实践中的构想方式的一些假设。这样做不仅着眼于教育系统中心与外围之间权力的司法和行政分配,而且还着眼于武力和政府性问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号