...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of production economics >Wholesale or drop-shipping: Contract choices of the online retailer and the manufacturer in a dual-channel supply chain
【24h】

Wholesale or drop-shipping: Contract choices of the online retailer and the manufacturer in a dual-channel supply chain

机译:批发或退出:在双通道供应链中的在线零售商和制造商的合同选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We consider a dual-channel supply chain consisting of a manufacturer, an online retailer, and a physical store, where the online order is fulfilled by either the conventional wholesale contract or the drop-shipping contract. We study the vertical and horizontal competitions among the three members via considering different power structures of the supply chain. To derive the contract choices of the online retailer and the manufacturer, we construct three game models to determine their optimal pricing decisions, investigate the corresponding applicable conditions and the most profitable power structure under each contract, then compare the profits between the two contracts. We find that: (i) The drop-shipping contract is the only option when the product's matching probability and the travel cost to the physical store are relatively low. (ii) No matter under which contract, the online retailer can benefit from the unbalanced bargaining power between the dual-channel retailers. But the manufacturer makes the most profit if the two retailers have the same bargaining power under the wholesale contract or if the online retailer is the first-mover under the drop-shipping contract. (iii) For the online retailer, the contract choice always depends on the profit-sharing ratio. For the manufacturer, the contract choice depends on the profit-sharing ratio if the product's matching probability and the travel cost to the physical store are moderate. Otherwise, either of the two contracts should be adopted under certain circumstances regardless of the profit-sharing ratio.
机译:我们考虑由制造商,在线零售商和物理商店组成的双通道供应链,其中通过传统的批发合同或下拉航运合同满足在线订单。我们通过考虑供应链的不同功率结构来研究三个成员之间的垂直和水平竞争。为了获得在线零售商和制造商的合同选择,我们建设了三种游戏模型来确定其最佳定价决策,调查相应的适用条件和每个合同下最有利可图的电力结构,然后比较两份合同之间的利润。我们发现:(i)下拉航运合同是产品匹配概率和物理商店的旅行成本唯一的选择是唯一的选择。 (ii)无论合同在哪些合同,在线零售商都可以从双通道零售商之间的不平衡谈判权中受益。但是,如果两名零售商在批发合同下具有相同的讨价还价权,或者在线零售商是在下拉航运合同下的第一个举行者,制造商最有利润。 (iii)对于在线零售商,合同选择总是取决于利润分享率。对于制造商,合同选择取决于产品的匹配概率和物理店的旅行成本,取决于利润共享比率。否则,无论利润共享率如何,应在某些情况下采用两项合同中的任何一个。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号