首页> 外文期刊>Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science >Historizing Epistemology in Psychology
【24h】

Historizing Epistemology in Psychology

机译:心理学认识论的历史化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The conflict between the psychometric methodological framework and the particularities of human experiences reported in psychotherapeutic context led Michael Schwarz to raise the question whether psychology is based on a methodological error. I take this conflict as a heuristic tool for the reconstruction of the early history of psychology, which bears witness to similar epistemological conflicts, though the dominant historiography of psychology has largely forgotten alternative conceptions and their valuable insights into complexities of psychic phenomena. In order to work against the historical amnesia in psychology I suggest to look at cultural-historical contexts which decisively shaped epistemological choices in psychology. Instead of keeping epistemology and history of psychology separate, which nurtures individualism and naturalism in psychology, I argue for historizing epistemology and for historical psychology. From such a historically reflected perspective psychology in contemporary world can be approached more critically.
机译:心理计量学方法框架与心理治疗背景中报道的人类经验的特殊性之间的冲突导致迈克尔·施瓦茨提出了一个问题,即心理学是否基于方法论错误。我将这种冲突作为一种重建心理学早期历史的启发式工具,尽管类似的认识论冲突也见证了类似的认识论冲突,尽管占主导地位的心理学史学已经很大程度上忘记了替代概念及其对心理现象复杂性的宝贵见解。为了与心理学中的历史遗忘症作斗争,我建议着眼于决定性地影响心理学认识论选择的文化历史背景。我主张将认识论和历史心理学分开,而不是将认识论和心理学历史分开,这会在心理学中培养个人主义和自然主义。从这种历史反映的角度来看,当代世界的心理学可以更批判地对待。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号