...
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial marketing management >Should tweets differ for B2B and B2C? An analysis of Fortune 500 companies' Twitter communications
【24h】

Should tweets differ for B2B and B2C? An analysis of Fortune 500 companies' Twitter communications

机译:B2B和B2C的推文是否应该有所不同?财富500强公司的Twitter通讯分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Business-to-business (B2B) marketers hesitate to embrace social media as a marketing tool, unlike their business-to-consumer (B2C) counterparts, and they struggle to implement successful social media strategies due to their limited understanding of the phenomenon. Drawing on communication and word-of-mouth theories, the authors investigate how marketers use Twitter differently across contexts and predict key factors likely to influence the message strategies used in each. A longitudinal content analysis and logistic regression support the assessment of a sample of more than 7000 tweets by Fortune 500 companies. Marketers in B2B and B2C settings exhibit significant differences in their branding and selling strategies; their use of message appeals; and the use of cues, links, and hashtags to support information searches. Whereas B2B marketers tend to use more emotional than functional appeals in their tweets, neither B2C nor B2B marketers have adopted "hard sell" message strategies. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:企业对企业(B2B)营销人员犹豫将社交媒体用作营销工具,与企业对消费者(B2C)同行不同,由于对现象的了解有限,他们难以实施成功的社交媒体策略。作者利用传播理论和口碑传播理论,研究了营销人员如何在不同情况下不同地使用Twitter,并预测可能影响每种策略中使用的消息策略的关键因素。纵向内容分析和逻辑回归支持《财富》 500强公司对超过7000条推文的评估。 B2B和B2C环境中的营销人员在品牌和销售策略上表现出很大差异;他们使用信息诉求;以及使用提示,链接和主题标签来支持信息搜索。尽管B2B营销人员在推文中倾向于使用功能性诉求而非情感诉求,但B2C和B2B营销人员均未采用“强行出售”消息策略。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号