首页> 外文期刊>Group decision and negotiation >Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Stream Restoration: Potential and Examples
【24h】

Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Stream Restoration: Potential and Examples

机译:流恢复的多准则决策分析:潜力和示例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Within stream restoration practice there has been little use of formal decision analysis methods for evaluating tradeoffs in selecting restoration sites and design alternatives. Restoration planning suffers from poorly defined objectives, confusion of objectives and means, and a lack of consideration of tradeoffs. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods have the potential to improve restoration decision making by quantifying non-economic objectives, communicating tradeoffs, facilitating consistent and explicit valuation, and focusing negotiation on ultimate objectives. To explore the potential usefulness of MCDA, we first review restoration practices and define the characteristics of projects that are good candidates for MCDA. We also present two case studies. The first study is a prioritization of stream reaches for restoration that illustrates how value judgments can affect such decisions. The second study addresses the proposed removal of the Ballville Dam on the Sandusky River in Ohio.rnAn important challenge in the dam removal decision is the linking of habitat improvements to changes in species populations and ecological services that people value. The analysis shows how MCDA can assist decision making by clarifying tradeoffs, in this case by showing that the key issues are conflicts among ecological criteria—not all of which are improved by restoration.
机译:在河流修复实践中,很少使用正式的决策分析方法来评估在选择修复站点和设计替代方案时的权衡。恢复计划受困于目标定义不明确,目标和手段混乱以及缺乏权衡取舍的问题。多准则决策分析(MCDA)方法有可能通过量化非经济目标,传达折衷方案,促进一致和明确的估值以及将谈判重点放在最终目标上来改善恢复决策。为了探索MCDA的潜在用途,我们首先回顾恢复实践并定义适合MCDA的项目的特征。我们还将介绍两个案例研究。第一项研究是确定恢复河段的优先次序,它说明了价值判断如何影响此类决策。第二项研究针对拟议中的俄亥俄州桑达斯基河上的鲍尔维尔大坝的拆除。拆除大坝的一项重要挑战是将栖息地的改善与人们所重视的物种种群和生态服务的变化联系起来。分析显示了MCDA如何通过阐明权衡取舍来协助决策,在这种情况下,通过显示关键问题是生态标准之间的冲突-并非所有问题都可以通过恢复加以改善。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Group decision and negotiation》 |2009年第4期|387-417|共31页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering,The Johns Hopkins University, 313 Ames Hall, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA;

    Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering,The Johns Hopkins University, 313 Ames Hall, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA Energetics Inc., 7067 Columbia Gateway Drive,Suite 200, Columbia, MD 21046, USA;

    Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering,The Johns Hopkins University, 313 Ames Hall, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA;

    Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering,The Johns Hopkins University, 313 Ames Hall, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA;

    Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    multiattribute decision analysis; environmental management; stream restoration; public involvement;

    机译:多属性决策分析;环境管理;流恢复;公众参与;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号