...
首页> 外文期刊>Food research international >Paired preference tests and placebo placement: 1. Should placebo pairs be placed before or after the target pair?
【24h】

Paired preference tests and placebo placement: 1. Should placebo pairs be placed before or after the target pair?

机译:配对偏好测试​​和安慰剂放置:1。在目标对之前或之后放置安慰剂对吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

One type of paired preference test uses the 'target' pair of stimuli under consideration to record the measured preferences (prefer A, Prefer B, 'no preference') and a second putatively identical control pair, the 'placebo' pair (AA or BB) to indicate 'false' preferences, unrelated to the target pair, elicited by the effects of the testing situation.From the literature there is disagreement regarding whether it is important to place a placebo pair before or after its corresponding target pair, to elicit a greater proportion of 'no preference' responses. This is important, because the higher the frequency of 'no preference' responses in the placebo pair, the more powerful will be the chi-squared style analysis, which determines whether the target pair displays a significant preference or not. It has been hypothesized that placing the placebo pair after the target pair would elicit more 'no preference' responses in the placebo, because the consumers would have had a chance to experience the difference in sensory characteristics of the two stimuli in the target pair. Using a related samples design, the hypothesis was confirmed although the difference between placebos placed before and after the target was not always significant. It was hypothesized that this lack of significance was caused by greater variance among the items being assessed, making it more difficult to decide whether a putatively placebo pair, in the context of the experiment, was really 'identical'. Psychological adjustments in the consumers were discussed in terms of difference and preference tau criteria. A boost in the proportion of 'no preferences' was observed for the placebo pair built into the triadic preference test, this was explained by the experimenter gaining some control over the consumers' preference tau criteria.
机译:一种类型的配对偏好测试​​使用正在考虑的“目标”对刺激以记录测量的偏好(更喜欢,更喜欢B,'不偏好')和第二借助相同的控制对,“安慰剂”(AA或BB )为了表示“假”偏好,由测试情况的​​效果引发的“假”偏好。通过文献引发了对其相应目标对之前或之后的安慰剂对中的一个重要的分歧。 “无偏好”回应的比例更大。这很重要,因为安慰剂对中“不偏好”响应的频率越高,Chi平方样式分析越强大,其确定目标对是否显示出显着的偏好。已经假设将安慰剂对放置在目标对之后,在安慰剂中引起更多“不偏好”响应,因为消费者将有机会体验目标对中两个刺激的感觉特征的差异。使用相关样品设计,确认假设虽然靶向靶前后放置的安置之间的差异并不总是显着的。假设这种缺乏意义是由于评估物品之间的更大方差,使得​​在实验的背景下,决定是否有借助安慰剂对真正“相同”。在差异和偏好Tau标准方面讨论了消费者的心理调整。在Triadbo偏好测试中,观察到“不偏好”的比例的提升,这是通过实验者获得一些对消费者偏好TAU标准的控制的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号