首页> 外文期刊>Expert Systems with Application >Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects
【24h】

Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects

机译:使用Delphi过程和Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)评估项目的复杂性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Project complexity is ever growing and needs to be understood, analysed and measured better to assist modern project management. The overall ambition of this paper is therefore to define a measure of project complexity in order to assist decision-making, notably when analysing several projects in a portfolio, or when studying different areas of a project. A synthesised literature review on existing complexity measures is firstly proposed in order to highlight their limitations. Then, we identify the multiple aspects of project complexity thanks to the construction and refinement of a project complexity framework thanks to an international Delphi study. We then propose a multi-criteria approach to project complexity evaluation, underlining the benefits of such an approach. In order to solve properly this multi-criteria problem, we first conduct a critical state of the art on multi-criteria methodologies. We then argue for the use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In the end, this tool permits to define a relative project complexity measure, which can notably assist decision-making. Complexity scales and subscales are defined in order to highlight the most complex alternatives and their principal sources of complexity within the set of criteria and sub-criteria which exist in the hierarchical structure. Finally, a case study within a start-up firm in the entertainment industry (musicals production) is performed. Conclusions, limitations and perspectives of research are given in the end.
机译:项目复杂性不断增长,需要更好地理解,分析和衡量,以协助现代项目管理。因此,本文的总体目标是定义一种衡量项目复杂性的方法,以帮助决策,尤其是在分析投资组合中的多个项目或研究项目的不同领域时。为了突出其局限性,首先提出了对现有复杂性度量的综合文献综述。然后,借助国际Delphi的研究,通过构建和完善项目复杂性框架,我们可以确定项目复杂性的多个方面。然后,我们提出了一种用于项目复杂性评估的多准则方法,强调了这种方法的好处。为了正确解决这个多标准问题,我们首先对多标准方法论进行了最新的研究。然后,我们争辩使用层次分析过程。最后,该工具允许定义一个相对的项目复杂性度量,可以显着地帮助决策。定义复杂性量表和子量表是为了在层次结构中存在的一组标准和子标准中突出最复杂的替代方案及其复杂性的主要来源。最后,在娱乐业(音乐制作)的初创公司中进行了案例研究。最后给出了研究结论,局限性和展望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号