首页> 外文期刊>Expert Systems with Application >Evaluation of new service concepts using rough set theory and group analytic hierarchy process
【24h】

Evaluation of new service concepts using rough set theory and group analytic hierarchy process

机译:使用粗糙集理论和群组层次分析法评估新服务概念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One of the most crucial stages in the new service development (NSD) process is concept selection, which is characterized by newly generated alternatives and vaguely defined concept evaluation criteria. Although a number of factors have been found to be influential, a lacuna remains as to how to make a strategic decision based on influential factors. This study proposes a systematic approach to evaluation of new service concepts (NSCs) by integrating the merit of group analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in modeling multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problems and the strength of rough set theory (RST) in handling subjectivity in concept evaluation. The suggested approach is designed to be executed in four discrete stages. First of all, a hierarchical AHP model for the evaluation of NSCs is constructed in terms of strategy, finance, market, technology, and implementation. Second, pairwise comparisons are made among criteria and sub-criteria, and preferences to NSCs with respect to the sub-criteria are obtained by domain experts. Third, the individual judgments obtained at the preceding stage are aggregated into group judgments. Finally, the NSCs are prioritized based on risk propensity of decision makers. A case study of the video game service is presented to illustrate the suggested approach. We believe that our method can promote consensus building on the promising NSCs.
机译:新服务开发(NSD)流程中最关键的阶段之一是概念选择,其特征在于新生成的替代方案和模糊定义的概念评估标准。尽管已发现许多影响因素,但如何根据影响因素做出战略决策仍存在空白。这项研究提出了一种系统的方法来评估新服务概念(NSC),方法是将组分析层次过程(AHP)在建模多准则决策(MCDM)问题中的优点与粗糙集理论(RST)的优势相结合概念评估中的主观性。建议的方法设计为在四个离散阶段执行。首先,从战略,财务,市场,技术和实施方面构建了用于评估NSC的层次AHP模型。其次,在标准和子标准之间进行成对比较,并且领域专家获得相对于子标准的NSC偏好。第三,将前一阶段获得的个人判断汇总为集体判断。最后,根据决策者的风险倾向对NSC进行优先级排序。提出了视频游戏服务的案例研究,以说明建议的方法。我们相信,我们的方法可以促进在有前途的NSC上建立共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号