首页> 外文学位 >Hybrid rational route choice approaches: Using concepts from fuzzy logic and the analytic hierarchy process.
【24h】

Hybrid rational route choice approaches: Using concepts from fuzzy logic and the analytic hierarchy process.

机译:混合理性路线选择方法:使用来自模糊逻辑和层次分析法的概念。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This research work represents two route choice models based on fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning for explaining route choice behavior in transportation planning. The first model is based on Weber's psycho-physical law of 1834. In this model, a set of fuzzy ‘if-then’ rules is developed to represent a typical driver's psychology for capturing preferences, pairwise, among alternatives that a person may consider. The second model is based on Teodorovic and Kikuchi's (1990) fuzzy ‘if-then’ rules. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is incorporated in both models, as part of the second stage of the models to represent the underlying decision-making mechanism. The advantage of the AHP is that it offers the flexibility for developing fuzzy ‘if-then’ rules and its theoretically justified scale for purposes of comparison.; First, route choice behavior is explained hierarchically for these models. Then, factors such as travel time, safety and congestion in route choice decision-making are modeled as fuzzy numbers. Based on the methodological features of these models, the input domains are categorized and linguistically labeled. Using fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning, drivers' preference allotment among the alternatives are assessed, pairwise. The results obtained from this first stage are then used as inputs for the AHP's pairwise matrices. Drivers' preferences on each alternative are estimated considering only one factor at a time. The final preference allocation among the alternatives is derived using the least squared error optimization technique.; Finally, these models are applied to a specific network to evaluate their effectiveness. These models are able to explain drivers' route choice behavior at both disaggregate and aggregate level with statistical significance. At the aggregate level, we also tested the predictive ability of these models against the traditional logit model. The results from these models provide better fit than the results obtained from the traditional approach.; These models provided that drivers' decision making process can be explicitly explained by a small set of intuitive and reasonable fuzzy ‘if-then’ rules and by the AHP. The results obtained show that these models present promising mathematical approaches with the ideas from psychology to model efficiently complex drivers' route choice decision making process in transportation planning.
机译:这项研究工作代表了两种基于模糊逻辑和近似推理的路线选择模型,用于解释运输规划中的路线选择行为。第一个模型基于韦伯1834年的心理物理定律。在该模型中,开发了一组模糊的“如果-那么”规则,以代表典型的驾驶员心理,成对地捕捉人们可能考虑的其他选择中的偏好。第二个模型基于Teodorovic和Kikuchi(1990)的模糊“ if-then”规则。这两个模型都采用了层次分析法(AHP),作为模型第二阶段的一部分,代表了潜在的决策机制。 AHP的优势在于,它为开发模糊的“如果-则”规则及其理论上合理的规模提供了灵活性,以进行比较。首先,针对这些模型分层解释了路由选择行为。然后,将路线选择决策中的旅行时间,安全性和拥堵等因素建模为模糊数。基于这些模型的方法学特征,对输入域进行了分类和语言标记。使用模糊逻辑和近似推理,可成对评估驾驶员在备选方案之间的偏好分配。然后将从第一阶段获得的结果用作AHP的成对矩阵的输入。每次选择仅考虑一个因素,即可估算出驾驶员对每种选择的偏好。使用最小二乘误差优化技术得出备选方案之间的最终偏好分配。最后,将这些模型应用于特定网络以评估其有效性。这些模型能够在分类和聚合级别上解释驾驶员的路线选择行为,具有统计意义。从总体上讲,我们还测试了这些模型相对于传统logit模型的预测能力。这些模型的结果比传统方法得到的结果更好。这些模型提供了驾驶员的决策过程可以通过一小部分直观且合理的模糊“如果-则”规则和AHP进行解释的方法。获得的结果表明,这些模型结合心理学的思想提出了有前途的数学方法,可以有效地模拟交通规划中复杂驾驶员的路线选择决策过程。

著录项

  • 作者

    Arslan, Turan.;

  • 作者单位

    Illinois Institute of Technology.;

  • 授予单位 Illinois Institute of Technology.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 153 p.
  • 总页数 153
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:46

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号