首页> 外文期刊>European Spine Journal >Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement of the manual examination of the lumbar spine in chronic low-back pain
【24h】

Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement of the manual examination of the lumbar spine in chronic low-back pain

机译:慢性腰背痛的腰椎手工检查的观察者内和观察者间协议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Examination is a cornerstone in the manual procedures leading to mobilisation/manipulation of the low back. The observer variation of the more specific segmental tests remains to be investigated. Two skilled specialists in manual medicine examined the segmental changes in the lumbar spine. The patients were unknown to the examiners and no information of the case history was given. All test results were recorded by an observer present in the room who ensured that no conversation was allowed during the examination. The primary outcome measures were the kappa values for each test. The matching was defined as acceptable (acc) within two neighbouring levels and perfect (per) on the same level. Intra-observer variation (tested in 33 patients and 10 subjects without low-back pain): The agreement between first and second segmental diagnosis examination was 70% (per) and 82% (per + acc). Kappa values were: segmental diagnosis 0.60 (per) and 0.70 (per + acc), multifidus test 0.51 (per) and 0.60 (per + acc), sideflexion 0.57 (per) and 0.69 (per + acc), and ventral flexion 0.31 (per) and 0.45 (per + acc). Inter-observer variation (tested in 60 patients): The agreement for segmental diagnosis between the examiner A and B was 42% (per) and 75% (per + acc). Kappa values were: segmental diagnosis 0.21 (per) and 0.57 (acc), multifidus test 0.12 (per) and 0.48 (acc), sideflexion 0.22 (per) and 0.45 (acc), and ventralflexion 0.22 (per) and 0.44 (acc). By manual tests, skilled examiners seem to be able to diagnose segmental dysfunctions in the low back. The clinical implication of these dysfunctions remains to be clarified.
机译:考试是导致腰部动员/操纵的手动程序的基石。观察者对更具体的分段测试的变化尚待研究。两名手工医学方面的专家检查了腰椎的节段变化。患者对检查者是未知的,并且没有给出病例历史的信息。所有测试结果均由在场的观察员记录下来,该观察员确保在检查过程中不允许谈话。主要结局指标是每次测试的卡伯值。匹配被定义为两个相邻级别内的可接受(acc)和同一级别上的完美(per)。观察者内部差异(在33位患者和10位无下背痛的受试者中进行了测试):第一次和第二次节段性诊断检查之间的一致性为70%(每次)和82%(每个+ acc)。 Kappa值是:节段性诊断0.60(每)和0.70(每+ acc),多发测试0.51(每)和0.60(每+ acc),侧屈0.57(每)和0.69(每+ acc)以及腹侧屈曲0.31( per)和0.45(per + acc)。观察者之间的差异(在60位患者中进行了测试):检查者A和B之间的分段诊断一致性为42%(每例)和75%(每+ acc)。 Kappa值分别为:分段诊断0.21(per)和0.57(acc),多发性测试0.12(per)和0.48(acc),侧屈0.22(per)和0.45(acc),腹侧屈肌0.22(per)和0.44(acc) 。通过手动测试,熟练的检查员似乎能够诊断下背部的节段性功能障碍。这些功能障碍的临床意义尚待阐明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号