...
首页> 外文期刊>Ethics and Social Welfare >Ethics and Conduct in Self-directed Groupwork: Some Lessons for the Development of a More Ethical Social Work Practice
【24h】

Ethics and Conduct in Self-directed Groupwork: Some Lessons for the Development of a More Ethical Social Work Practice

机译:自我指导的团队合作中的道德与行为:发展更具道德的社会工作实践的一些教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper compares and contrasts the impact and the interface of different sets of values held by social care practitioners in their decision-making process with regard to ethical dilemmas. Specifically, it explores some of the fundamental distinctions between self-directed groupworkers and other qualified social workers practising in both statutory and voluntary sectors. The methodology is qualitative and draws upon a Grounded Theory process. In contrasting the contribution of different sets of values in decision making, we found that participants, regardless of their approach to work, showed an overall fit between their personal and professional values. However, when we explored the influence of participants’ agencies on their decision-making processes, participants tended to prioritise organisational values, whereas for participants practising in the self-directed approach, the impact was less marked. Reflections on the role of values in increasing social workers’ resistance to organisational constraints, and discussion of some implications for social work education, conclude the article.View full textDownload full textKeywordsValues in Tension, Ethical Decision Making, Social Work Practice, Social Work Education, Self-directed Groupwork, Social Work Ethics, Organisational Constraints, ResistanceRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2011.563749
机译:本文比较并对比了社会护理从业人员在决策过程中所面临的道德困境的不同价值观念的影响和接口。具体来说,本章探讨了自律型团体工作者与其他在法定和志愿部门工作的合格社会工作者之间的一些根本区别。该方法是定性的,并基于扎根的理论过程。通过对比不同价值观念在决策中的贡献,我们发现参与者,无论采用何种工作方式,都表现出其个人价值观和职业价值观之间的整体契合度。但是,当我们探讨参与者的代理机构对其决策过程的影响时,参与者倾向于优先考虑组织价值,而对于以自我指导的方式进行实践的参与者而言,影响并不明显。文章总结了对价值在增加社会工作者对组织约束的抵抗力中的作用的思考,并讨论了对社会工作教育的一些影响。查看全文下载全文关键词,自我指导的团队合作,社会工作道德操守,组织约束,抵抗力相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2011.563749

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号