首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Social Work, The >Social Supervision, Ethics and Risk: An Evaluation of How Ethical Frameworks Might Be Applied within the Social Supervisionn Process
【24h】

Social Supervision, Ethics and Risk: An Evaluation of How Ethical Frameworks Might Be Applied within the Social Supervisionn Process

机译:社会监督,道德与风险:对在社会监督过程中如何应用道德框架的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Service users subject to section 41 of the Mental Health Act 1983 come under the scrutiny of both the mental health and the criminal justice systems. Much of the sociological literature in this area focuses on the growth of risk-related practices in which risk management is arguably displacing more traditional notions of care. Social workers who are working with service users subject to section 41 are faced with a number of ethical dilemmas. This paper outlines Kantian, utilitarian and virtue ethics and their possible application to work with service users subject to section 41. The ethical dilemmas in applying risk assessment tools are then examined. Finally, the article draws on published research of service user views in order to consider ethical dilemmas further. The author concludes by considering how social workers might apply the ethical principles discussed.
机译:受1983年《精神卫生法》第41条约束的服务使用者受到精神卫生和刑事司法系统的审查。该领域的许多社会学文献都集中在与风险相关的实践的发展上,在这种实践中,风险管理可以说取代了更多传统的护理概念。与受第41条约束的服务使用者一起工作的社会工作者面临着许多道德困境。本文概述了康德,功利和美德道德规范,以及它们在与第41节相关的服务使用者合作中的可能应用。然后,研究了风险评估工具应用中的道德困境。最后,本文借鉴了服务用户观点的已发表研究,以进一步考虑道德困境。作者在最后总结了社会工作者如何应用所讨论的道德原则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号