【24h】

Book review

机译:书评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The sound governance of potentially hazardous chemicals is crucial to both economic progress and the protection of environmental and public health, yet the topic has received comparatively little scholarly attention in recent years. Moreover, this neglect extends beyond the academy-although chemical contamination was once the poster child of the dark side of technological progress, environmental NGOs have redirected their attention almost en-masse to global warming, whilst policy analysts increasingly concern themselves with the emerging risks posed by nanotech and GM technologies. Chemicals regulation just isn't sexy anymore. However, no hostage to fashion, Henrik Selin has stepped into the breach and provided us with a cogent, empirically rich analysis of the complexities involved in managing chemicals at the global level. In this review, I'll outline the content of Selin's book, touch upon its strengths and weaknesses, before ending by reflecting on where this sort of research might go in the future.Selin prefaces his analysis by observing that the global chemicals regime is somewhat unique in environmental law, in that rather than beginning with a framework convention that is later fleshed out through detailed protocols (as with, e.g., the ozone layer and climate change), countries have instead enacted a set of four free-standing multilateral agreements that deal with overlapping issues (the Basel, Rotterdam, CLRTAP, and Stockholm Conventions). Although these agreements are ostensibly independent, in reality they share a range of legal, political and practical connections. Of particular interest to Selin are two sorts of such "institutional linkages."
机译:对潜在危险化学品的健全管理对于经济发展以及保护环境和公共健康均至关重要,但是近年来,该主题在学术上受到的关注相对较少。此外,这种忽视已经超出了学术界的范围,尽管化学污染曾经是技术进步的阴暗面的典型代表,但环保非政府组织将注意力几乎转移到了全球变暖上,而政策分析家越来越多地关注所面临的新出现的风险由纳米技术和转基因技术。化学制品法规不再是性感的。但是,亨利克·塞林(Henrik Selin)决不妨碍时尚,因此闯入了漏洞,并为我们提供了有力的,经验丰富的分析,以分析全球范围内化学品管理所涉及的复杂性。在这篇评论中,我将概述Selin的书的内容,探讨其优势和劣势,最后总结一下这种研究在未来的发展方向。各国在环境法上是独特的,而不是先通过后来通过详细协议充实的框架公约(例如与臭氧层和气候变化有关的框架公约)开始,相反,各国颁布了一套四项独立的多边协议,处理重叠的问题(巴塞尔公约,鹿特丹公约,CLRTAP公约和斯德哥尔摩公约)。尽管这些协议表面上是独立的,但实际上它们具有一系列的法律,政治和实践联系。塞林特别感兴趣的是两种这样的“机构联系”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment international》 |2011年第3期|p.654-655|共2页
  • 作者

    Brian MacGillivray;

  • 作者单位

    CRASSH, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:29:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号