首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Experimental study on the quasi-static progressive collapse response of post-and-beam mass timber buildings under corner column removal scenarios
【24h】

Experimental study on the quasi-static progressive collapse response of post-and-beam mass timber buildings under corner column removal scenarios

机译:角柱拆除方案下梁围块木材建筑准静态渐进崩溃响应的实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study presents the results from two quasi-static experimental tests performed on a 1/4-scale, 2 x 2-bay, postand-beam mass timber substructure, with Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) floors and Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) frames, subjected to corner column removal scenarios. One substructure was constructed and tested twice under different CLT panel configurations. In the first test (Test CM-1), the bay adjacent to the removed corner column consisted of three CLT floor panels, with two panels spanning one bay and one panel extending past the bay and spanning two bays. A constant Uniformly Distributed Pressure (UDP) was first applied to the bays not adjacent to the removed column and the UDP on the bay adjacent to the removed column was increased till failure through a six-point loading tree. As failure did not extend past the vicinity of the removed column in CM1, the damaged elements were replaced and the specimen was re-tested by removing the diagonally opposite corner column. In this second test (Test CM-2), the bay adjacent to the removed corner column now consisted of one CLT floor panel spanning one bay and two panels spanning two bays. A similar loading protocol to that of Test CM-1 was used in CM-2. The substructure was assembled from a commonly used commercial beam-tocolumn connection. The failure modes, load redistribution mechanisms (alternative load paths) and overall behaviour are presented in this paper. The two test results showed that the applied load was mainly transferred to the three columns, the closest to the removed column. The ultimate load in Test CM-2 was 1.62 times higher than Test CM-1, demonstrating that the layout of the CLT panels plays a critical role against progressive collapse. A simplified analytical model, consistent with the current industry practice and pre-defined alternative load paths, was developed for the tested specimen to predict the ultimate resistance capacity and was also compared to the experimental tests. On average, the experimental failure load was 2.7 times higher than the predicted one, indicating that simplified current design practice is conservative.
机译:本研究介绍了两种准静态实验试验的结果,在1/4级,2×2架,八柱大质量木材结构上进行,带有交叉层压木材(CLT)地板和层压贴面木材(LVL)框架,经过角落列删除方案。在不同的CLT面板配置下构造并测试了一个子结构。在第一次测试(测试CM-1)中,与移除的角柱相邻的海湾由三个CLT底板组成,两个面板跨越一个托架,一个面板延伸超过海湾并跨越两个海湾。首先将恒定的均匀分布的压力(UDP)施加到不附近除去的柱的海湾,并且通过六点装载树增加了与移除的塔相邻的海湾上的UDP。由于故障未在CM1中延伸到除去的柱附近,因此取代了损坏的元件,通过去靠对角角柱来重新测试样品。在该第二次测试(测试CM-2)中,与移除的拐角柱相邻的海湾现在包括一个跨越一个托架的一个CLT底板和两个横向的两个面板。在CM-2中使用与测试CM-1的类似加载方案。将子结构从常用的商业束 - 托管连接组装。本文提出了失效模式,负载再分布机制(替代负载路径)和整体行为。两个测试结果表明,施加的载荷主要转移到三柱,最接近除去的柱。测试CM-2中的最终负载比测试CM-1高1.62倍,表明CLT面板的布局对逐步崩溃起着关键作用。一种简化的分析模型,与当前的行业实践和预定义的替代负载路径一致,为测试的标本开发,以预测最终的阻力容量,并且也与实验测试相比。平均而言,实验失效负载比预测的载荷高2.7倍,表明简化的当前设计实践是保守的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号