首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Lateral cyclic testing and backbone curve development of high-strength steel built-up box columns under axial compression
【24h】

Lateral cyclic testing and backbone curve development of high-strength steel built-up box columns under axial compression

机译:轴压下高强度钢内置箱柱的横向循环试验和骨干曲线开发

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The AISC 341 (2016) has a more stringent width-to-thickness (b/t) limit for highly ductile hollow box columns (HBCs) than the AIJ (2010) or Taiwan Code (2010), resulting in significant thickness difference in design. Moreover, the cyclic backbone curves based on ASCE 41 (2013) and N1ST (2017) underestimate the post-buckling flexural strength of HBCs, particularly in high axial compression force. This paper presents test results of six full-scale, built-up HBCs using SM 570 M steel with the actual yield strength of 460-530 MPa. The lateral cyclic behavior of built-up columns was studied in terms of different b/t ratios, magnitudes of axial compression forces, and lateral drift histories (i.e., cyclically symmetric versus near-fault displacement histories). The built-up box columns were 290-400 mm wide with b/t ratios from 11 to 21, 4000 mm high, and tested laterally with both ends fixed after under a constant axial compression force, 2591-7935 kN. The HBC specimens which were designed based on the highly ductile member requirement in AISC 341 (2016), even under an axial compression force (= 40%P_y), performed satisfactorily at 4% drift and experienced flange and web fracture at 5% drift. However, the HBC specimens that satisfied the most compact b/t requirement in AIJ (2010) or Taiwan code (2010) did not perform well at 4% drift, losing the axial capacity after significant column local buckling and shortening. The gathered test data, supported by more test data in this work, were analyzed by a multiple regression method to obtain empirical formulations for predicting the maximum column moment, plastic rotation and post-yield hardening parameters. The proposed formulation reasonably predicts the first-cycle envelope curves of built-up HBCs, improving prediction results based on ASCE 41 (2013) and NIST (2017).
机译:AISC 341(2016)具有比AIJ(2010)或台湾代码(2010)更严格的宽度厚度(B / T)限制为高度延展性空心箱列(HBC),导致设计中的显着厚度差异。此外,基于ASCE 41(2013)和N1ST(2017)的循环骨干曲线低估HBC的后屈曲弯曲强度,特别是在高轴向压缩力中。本文介绍了使用SM 570 M钢的六个全尺寸,建立HBC的测试结果,实际屈服强度为460-530 MPa。在不同的B / T比率,轴向压缩力的大小和横向漂移历史(即,循环对称与近近断裂位移历史)进行了内置柱的横向循环行为。内置箱柱为290-400 mm宽,B / T比率为11至21,4000毫米,并在恒定的轴向压缩力下,两端横向测试,在恒定的轴向压缩力下,2591-7935KN。基于AISC 341(2016)的高度延展构件要求,即使在轴向压缩力(= 40%p_Y)下,令人满意地在4%漂移和5%漂移的凸缘和腹部骨折上进行设计的HBC样本。然而,满足AIJ(2010)或台湾代码(2010)中最紧致的B / T要求的HBC标本在4%漂移下表现不佳,在显着柱型屈曲和缩短后失去轴向容量。通过多元回归方法分析由该工作中更多测试数据支持的聚集的测试数据,以获得用于预测最大列矩,塑性旋转和产率后硬化参数的经验制剂。所提出的制定合理地预测了内置HBC的第一周期包络曲线,改善了基于ASCE 41(2013)和NIST(2017)的预测结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号