首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Aerodynamic loads and traffic safety of high-speed trains when passing through two windproof facilities under crosswind: A comparative study
【24h】

Aerodynamic loads and traffic safety of high-speed trains when passing through two windproof facilities under crosswind: A comparative study

机译:高速列车在侧风下通过两个防风设施时的空气动力学负荷和交通安全:比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Windbreak (WB) and anti-wind open-cut tunnel (AOT) are two common windproof facilities for high-speed railways in windy areas. This study aims to conducts a comparison of the aerodynamic loads and corresponding traffic safety of both windproof facilities when the high-speed train (HST) passes through them under crosswind conditions. The aerodynamic loads are obtained via CFD simulation, and safety indexes are generated through the wind-train-track dynamic analysis system. The main common characteristics between AOT and WB cases are as follows. Firstly, the fluctuation amplitudes of the five aerodynamic loads of each carriage in two periods (i.e., entry and exit) are remarkably greater than those in other periods (i.e., running completely in crosswind or windproof facilities). Secondly, the sudden increase in the fluctuation amplitudes of the safety indexes is an important factor in the reduced safety of HST traffic, and the derailment coefficient (DC) of the head carriage is the key to control the safety of the entire HST. Thirdly, the existence of the ends of windproof facilities narrows the original safety domain scope of the HST running only in crosswind. The main differences between AOT and WB cases are as follows. Firstly, the maximum fluctuation amplitudes of the five aerodynamic loads of each carriage in the WB case are generally greater than the corresponding values in the AOT case, whether entry or exit, under the same conditions of train and crosswind speeds. Secondly, the scope of safety domain when the HST passes through the ends of the WB is considerably smaller than that of the HST passing through the AOT ends, and the AOT is more effective than WB in terms of windproof effects. Thirdly, for the high-speed railway in the windy area with AOT and WB, the safety domain boundaries V-t = -6.3V(w) + 3433 and V-t = -10V(w) + 350 can be used respectively to provide a reference for traffic safety command.
机译:防风(WB)和防风明挖隧道(AOT)是多风地区高速铁路的两种常用防风设施。这项研究旨在比较高速列车(HST)在侧风条件下通过这两个防风设施时的空气动力学负荷和相应的交通安全。通过CFD仿真获得空气动力学载荷,并通过风车轨道动态分析系统生成安全指标。 AOT和WB案件之间的主要共同特征如下。首先,每个车厢在两个时期(即进入和离开)的五个空气动力负荷的波动幅度明显大于其他时期(即完全在侧风或防风设施中运行)的波动幅度。其次,安全性指标波动幅度的突然增加是影响HST交通安全性的重要因素,而头部托架的脱轨系数(DC)是控制整个HST安全性的关键。第三,防风设施末端的存在缩小了仅在侧风条件下运行的HST的原始安全范围范围。 AOT和WB案件之间的主要区别如下。首先,在相同的火车和侧风速度条件下,在WB情况下,每个车厢的五个空气动力学载荷的最大波动幅度通常大于在AOT情况下的相应值,无论是进入还是退出。其次,当HST穿过WB端部时,安全域的范围比穿过AOT端的HST时要小得多,就防风效果而言,AOT比WB更有效。第三,对于AOT和WB多风地区的高速铁路,安全域边界Vt = -6.3V(w)+ 3433和Vt = -10V(w)+ 350可以分别为交通安全命令。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号