首页> 外文期刊>Educational Theory >DEFENDING RIGHTS IN (SPECIAL) EDUCATION
【24h】

DEFENDING RIGHTS IN (SPECIAL) EDUCATION

机译:(特殊)教育中的辩护权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The state's commitment to educating all children can be framed as a matter of human capital development, or the economic benefits accrued to individuals and society as a result of educational attainment; it can be framed as a matter of capabilities, or the development of functionings that enable human flourishing,- and it can be framed as a matter of rights. In this essay Sigal Ben-Porath considers the relative merits of the three approaches, elaborating the implications each of these different frameworks has for the education of children with disabilities. While the capabilities approach, which arises from and relates to the rights approach, is sensitive to the needs of individuals with disabilities (more than the human capital approach is, in any case), Ben-Porath concludes that a rights framework can best express through educational policy the state's commitment to the education of all children, regardless of ability.
机译:国家对所有儿童进行教​​育的承诺可以从人力资本发展或教育程度的结果为个人和社会带来的经济利益来界定;它可以根据能力或使人类蓬勃发展的功能发展而定,也可以根据权利而定。在本文中,Sigal Ben-Porath考虑了这三种方法的相对优点,阐述了这些不同框架对残疾儿童教育的意义。尽管能力方法源于权利方法并与之相关,但它对残障人士的需求敏感(在任何情况下都比人力资本方法更为重要),但本-波拉斯得出结论认为,权利框架可以通过以下方式最好地表达:教育政策国家对所有儿童进行教​​育的承诺,不论其能力如何。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Theory》 |2012年第1期|p.25-39|共15页
  • 作者

    Sigal Ben-Porath;

  • 作者单位

    Graduate School of Education at the University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号