首页> 外文期刊>Educational Theory >JUST THE FACTS? THE SEPARATION OF SEX EDUCATION FROM MORAL EDUCATION
【24h】

JUST THE FACTS? THE SEPARATION OF SEX EDUCATION FROM MORAL EDUCATION

机译:事实如何?从道德教育中分离性教育

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this essay Sharon Lamb considers how progressives have begun to win the longstanding battle to shape sex education and what they have had to give up in the process. After framing the battle in historical context, Lamb uses discourse analysis to explore the hidden values in the "evidence-based" (EB) curricula that progressives currently favor and that pass for neutral today. As her analysis reveals, EB curricula privilege three discourses-a discourse of science, a discourse of healthy choices (with an emphasis on individuals), and a discourse of efficacy-all of which are grounded in ideology and serve to legitimize certain kinds of knowledge while undermining other kinds. Lamb concludes by proposing eight tenets for the future of sexuality education, which are intended to displace the eight tenets codified by proponents of abstinence-only-until-marriage sexuality education.
机译:在这篇文章中,莎朗·兰姆(Sharon Lamb)考虑了进步主义者如何开始赢得长期的塑造性教育的斗争,以及他们在这一过程中必须放弃的东西。在历史背景下确定这场战斗之后,兰姆(Lamb)使用话语分析来探索“循证”(EB)课程中隐藏的价值观,这些课程的进步者目前偏爱该方法,而今天这些方法已成为中立者。正如她的分析所揭示的那样,EB课程优先考虑三种话语:科学话语,健康选择话语(强调个人)和功效话语,所有这些话都基于意识形态,并且有助于使某些知识合法化同时破坏其他种类。最后,兰姆为性教育的未来提出了八项原则,旨在取代仅节欲直至婚姻的性教育拥护者所编纂的八项原则。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Theory》 |2013年第5期|443-460|共18页
  • 作者

    Sharon Lamb;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Counseling and School Psychology University of Massachusetts Boston;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号