首页> 外文期刊>Educational Review >Boundary crossings in research: towards a cultural understanding of the research project 'Transforming Learning Cultures in Further Education'
【24h】

Boundary crossings in research: towards a cultural understanding of the research project 'Transforming Learning Cultures in Further Education'

机译:研究的边界:对研究项目“在继续教育中转变学习文化”的文化理解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To achieve its aim of deepening understanding of the complexities of learning in Further Education (FE), the Transforming Learning Cultures in FE (TLC) project developed a model of learning as a cultural activity. The purpose of this paper is to explore the implications of taking a cultural view, not of learning, but of the research itself. The paper provides a description of the TLC project in cultural terms, but is also of general interest in the field of research methodology, with the account of this project serving as an illustration of how research generally might be described in this way. The paper draws heavily on Activity Theory and on the work of Bourdieu, showing how the latter further enriches the former. It concentrates on two examples of cultural analysis of the project: (i) managing large multiple case studies; (ii) integrating qualitative and quantitative methods within a consistent interpretivist approach. In describing the multiple case studies, the paper identifies the key boundary objects that enabled the different teams to collaborate on building a project-wide understanding of learning cultures in FE thus avoiding the risk that our large project could become little more than a series of loosely connected smaller case studies. In describing the combination of qualitative and quantitative enquiry, it shows how similar boundary objects enabled us to move iteratively across the qualitative/quantitative boundary. In both analyses, the paper shows how the habitus of the members of the project team was influential in allowing these boundary objects to come into full play, and how the details of the field affected our decision-making about optimal ways of working. We argue that our research decisions were particularly influenced by aspects of habitus and field when these showed an element of synergy, and illustrate the negative impact of a lack of synergy on one aspect of our project.
机译:为了实现加深对继续教育(FE)中学习复杂性的理解的目标,FE中的转化学习文化(TLC)项目开发了一种作为文化活动的学习模型。本文的目的是探讨采取文化观点而不是学习观点,而是研究本身的含义。本文从文化角度对TLC项目进行了描述,但在研究方法学领域也引起了广泛关注,该项目的说明可用来说明通常如何以这种方式描述研究。该论文大量借鉴了活动理论和布迪厄的作品,展示了布迪厄如何进一步丰富了前者。它集中于该项目的文化分析的两个示例:(i)管理大型的多个案例研究; (ii)将定性和定量方法整合到一致的解释主义方法中。在描述多个案例研究时,本文确定了关键的边界对象,这些关键的边界对象使不同的团队可以合作建立项目范围内对有限元学习文化的理解,从而避免了我们的大型项目可能变得仅仅是一系列松散的风险连接较小的案例研究。在描述定性和定量查询的组合时,它显示了相似的边界对象如何使我们能够迭代地跨定性/定量边界。在这两种分析中,论文都显示了项目团队成员的习性如何在充分发挥这些边界对象的影响力,以及领域的细节如何影响我们对最佳工作方式的决策。我们认为,当习性和领域表现出协同作用时,我们的研究决策尤其受到习惯和领域的影响,并说明缺乏协同作用对我们项目的一个方面的负面影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Review》 |2007年第4期|483-499|共17页
  • 作者

    Keith Postlethwaite;

  • 作者单位

    University of Exeter, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:54:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号