首页> 外文期刊>Educational Psychology in Practice >A content analysis of school anti-bullying policies: progress and limitations
【24h】

A content analysis of school anti-bullying policies: progress and limitations

机译:学校反欺凌政策的内容分析:进展与局限

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Schools in England are legally required to have an anti-bullying policy, but the little research so far suggests that they may lack coverage in important areas. An analysis of 142 school anti-bullying policies, from 115 primary schools and 27 secondary schools in one county was undertaken. A 31-item scoring scheme was devised to assess policy. Overall, schools had about 40% of the items in their policies. Most included improving school climate, a definition of bullying including reference to physical, verbal and relational forms, and a statement regarding contact with parents when bullying incidents occurred. But many schools did not mention other important aspects, and there was low coverage of responsibilities beyond those of teaching staff; following up of incidents; management and use of records; and specific preventative measures such as playground work and peer support. There was infrequent mention of homophobic bullying, and of cyberbullying. There was little difference between policies from primary and secondary schools. Findings are discussed in terms of national policy, and ways to support schools in maximising the potential of their policies for reducing bullying.
机译:依法要求英格兰的学校必须实行反欺凌政策,但到目前为止,很少有研究表明,它们在重要领域可能没有覆盖面。对一个县的115所小学和27所中学的142项学校反欺凌政策进行了分析。设计了一个31项评分方案来评估政策。总体而言,学校政策中有大约40%的项目。其中大多数包括改善学校氛围,对欺凌的定义(包括身体,言语和亲戚形式的参考),以及关于发生欺凌事件时与父母联系的声明。但是许多学校没有提到其他重要方面,而且除了教职人员以外,责任的覆盖率很低。跟踪事件;记录的管理和使用;以及具体的预防措施,例如游乐场工作和同伴支持。很少有人提到恐同欺凌和网络欺凌。中小学的政策几乎没有区别。我们将根据国家政策以及支持学校最大限度地发挥其减少欺凌行为的政策潜力的方式来讨论研究结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号