...
首页> 外文期刊>Education and information technologies >Comparing German and American students' cognitive strategies and affective attributes toward online inquiry
【24h】

Comparing German and American students' cognitive strategies and affective attributes toward online inquiry

机译:将德国和美国学生认知策略与情感属性与在线查询相比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Competent use of the Internet to locate information is an important skill for today's youth. Yet, many lack the knowledge and dispositions to engage in the processes necessary to effectively and efficiently find information on the Internet. As a result, various countries have incorporated references to the processes of online inquiry within their educational standards. Despite similarities in these standards, however, international comparisons are rare and have not produced insights into broader themes and patterns regarding how cognitive, metacognitive, and affective variables interact to influence outcomes on related measures of success, e.g., international assessments. The purpose of this research was two-fold: to examine the measurement invariance of a German-language version of the Survey of Online Reading Attitudes and Behaviors across a sample of participants from Germany and to compare the results with students from United States who completed the English-version of SORAB. The results justified comparisons across the samples with respect to the latent factor variables and comparisons yielded differences associated with cognitive and behavioral engagement, value/ interest, and anxiety. No differences were noted with regard to self-regulation and efficacy for online reading. Implications are framed within broader contextual variables that may have been influential in producing the differences between the samples.
机译:有能力使用互联网来定位信息是当今青年的重要技能。然而,许多人缺乏从事有效有效地查找互联网信息所需的过程的知识和倾向。因此,各国纳入了对其教育标准内的在线查询过程的参考。然而,尽管这些标准中的相似之处,但是,国际比较罕见,并且没有对更广泛的主题和模式产生有关认知,元认知和情感变量相互作用的洞察力,以影响相关措施的成功措施,例如国际评估。本研究的目的是两倍:检查德国参与者样本的在线阅读态度和行为调查的德语版本的测量不变性,并将结果与​​来自美国完成的学生进行比较英语版索拉布。结果在潜在因子变量和比较方面对样品的比较局限性与认知和行为接合,价值/兴趣和焦虑有关的差异。关于在线阅读的自我调节和疗效没有差异。含义在更广泛的上下文变量中构成框架,这可能在产生样品之间的差异方面是有影响力的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号