首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Economics focus Development piecemeal
【24h】

Economics focus Development piecemeal

机译:经济学重点发展零碎

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Over the past 15 years or so, economists have developed a long list of now-familiar remedies for developing countries hoping to grow their way to prosperity. This "Washington Consensus" includes the removal of trade protection and the introduction of deregulation, as well as fiscal and monetary discipline. And these are just for starters. The trouble is that many governments find it almost impossible to stick to these prescriptions. Meanwhile, other economists have suggested that development depends not on specific policies but on "institutional" factors, such as a respect for property rights, which constrain the powers of the state. This can sound like a counsel of despair, because such institutions and customs can take many years, even centuries, to become established. However, two new studies suggest that there is no need to be so gloomy. They argue that institutional overhaul and broad economic reforms are not necessary to spur economic growth. In fact, quantitative evidence that they do so is surprisingly difficult to find. Smaller policy changes may serve just as well, and pave the way for later reforms of institutions.
机译:在过去的15年左右的时间里,经济学家已经为希望发展自己的繁荣之路的发展中国家制定了许多目前熟悉的补救措施。 《华盛顿共识》包括取消贸易保护和实行放松管制,以及财政和货币纪律。这些只是初学者。问题在于许多政府发现几乎不可能遵守这些规定。同时,其他经济学家认为,发展不取决于具体的政策,而取决于“制度性”因素,例如尊重财产权,这会制约国家的权力。这听起来像是一个绝望的顾问,因为这样的机构和习俗可能需要很多年甚至几个世纪才能建立起来。但是,两项新的研究表明,不必如此令人沮丧。他们认为,机构改革和广泛的经济改革对刺激经济增长不是必要的。实际上,令人惊讶的是很难找到定量的证据证明它们这样做。较小的政策变化可能同样有用,并为以后的机构改革铺平了道路。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2004年第8387期|p.71|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济;各科经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:32:49

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号