首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Questions of equity
【24h】

Questions of equity

机译:公平问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It is easy to understand why many in Congress and beyond have demanded salary caps on bank executives as a condition of approving the Bush administration's bail-out of the financial system. After all, many of the people who will be leading the effort to get the banks back on their feet were the very same masters of the universe whose greed and myopia brought the industry to its knees in the first place. Nonetheless the lawmakers' apparent decision to impose some form of still unspecified wage limit, a demand reluctantly accepted by Hank Paulson and the Bush administration this week, is a mistake.rnJust now, it is a struggle to keep a straight face when you read the words "talent" and "Wall Street" in the same sentence. And yet, precisely because it is in a mess, the financial system will need decent managers if it is to return to the health that benefits the rest of the economy.
机译:容易理解的是,为什么在国会以及其他地方,许多人要求对银行高管的薪资上限作为批准布什政府对金融体系纾困的条件。毕竟,许多将带领银行重新站起来的人都是宇宙的主人,他们的贪婪和近视首先使该行业屈服。尽管如此,立法者显然决定强加某种形式的仍未指定的工资限制,这一要求在本周被汉克·保尔森和布什政府勉强接受,这是一个错误。 “人才”和“华尔街”在同一句子中。然而,恰恰是因为混乱不堪,如果金融体系要恢复对其他经济体有利的健康,就将需要体面的管理者。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2008年第8599期|18|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:31:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号