首页> 外文期刊>Early Education & Development >Connecting Neuroscience, Cognitive, and Educational Theories and Research to Practice: A Review of Mathematics Intervention Programs
【24h】

Connecting Neuroscience, Cognitive, and Educational Theories and Research to Practice: A Review of Mathematics Intervention Programs

机译:将神经科学,认知和教育理论与研究与实践联系起来:数学干预计划的回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research Findings: This article describes major theories and research on math cognition across the fields of neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and education and connects these literatures to intervention practices. Commercially available math intervention programs were identified and evaluated using the following questions: (a) Did neuroscience research inform the development of the program? or Is the program consistent with neuroscience theory and research? (b) Which cognitive processes are targeted by the program? and (c) What kinds of research support the program? A detailed review is provided for each program supported by empirical, peer-reviewed research. Practice or Policy: Twenty commercially available math intervention programs designed for pre-kindergarten through 3rd-grade students were identified. Three programs had publisher-reported use of neuroscience research in their development: Fluency and Automaticity through Systematic Teaching with Technology (FASTT Math), Number Worlds, and The Number Race. Five programs reported empirical, peer-reviewed research and are reviewed in detail: Accelerated Math, Corrective Mathematics, FASTT Math, Number Worlds, and The Number Race. Results indicate that although a great number of programs are available, few have been validated through empirical, peer-reviewed research. Practitioners should carefully review programs prior to their implementation, paying particular attention to targeted cognitive processes and the research base supporting the program's efficacy.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2012.617289
机译:研究结果:本文介绍了神经科学,认知心理学和教育领域的数学认知的主要理论和研究,并将这些文献与干预实践联系起来。使用以下问题确定并评估了可商购的数学干预计划:(a)神经科学研究是否为该计划的发展提供了信息?或该程序是否与神经科学理论和研究一致? (b)该计划针对哪些认知过程? (c)哪些研究支持该计划?为每个计划提供了详细的评论,该研究由经验,同行评审研究支持。实践或政策:确定了针对幼儿园至三年级学生设计的20种可商购的数学干预计划。出版商报告了三个程序在开发过程中使用了神经科学研究:通过技术的系统教学(FASTT Math)的流畅性和自动化,Number Worlds和Number Race。五个程序报告了经验,经过同行评审研究,并进行了详细审查:加速数学,纠正数学,FASTT数学,数字世界和数字竞赛。结果表明,尽管有很多程序可用,但很少有经过经验,同行评审的研究得到验证的。从业者应在计划实施之前仔细检查计划,尤其要关注目标认知过程和支持计划功效的研究基础。查看全文下载全文,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2012.617289

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号