...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >Correlation between the γ passing rates of IMRT plans and the volumes of air cavities and bony structures in head and neck cancer
【24h】

Correlation between the γ passing rates of IMRT plans and the volumes of air cavities and bony structures in head and neck cancer

机译:IMRT计划的γ传递率与头部癌症中的空气腔体积与空洞骨骼结构的相关性

获取原文

摘要

Both patient-specific dose recalculation and γ passing rate analysis are important for the quality assurance (QA) of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans. The aim of this study was to analyse the correlation between the γ passing rates and the volumes of air cavities (Vair) and bony structures (Vbone) in target volume of head and neck cancer. Twenty nasopharyngeal carcinoma and twenty nasal natural killer T-cell lymphoma patients were enrolled in this study. Nine-field sliding window IMRT plans were produced and the dose distributions were calculated by anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA), Acuros XB algorithm (AXB) and SciMoCa based on the Monte Carlo (MC) technique. The dose distributions and γ passing rates of the targets, organs at risk, air cavities and bony structures were compared among the different algorithms. The γ values obtained with AAA and AXB were 95.6?±?1.9% and 96.2?±?1.7%, respectively, with 3%/2?mm criteria (p??0.05). There were significant differences (p??0.05) in the γ values between AAA and AXB in the air cavities (86.6?±?9.4% vs. 98.0?±?1.7%) and bony structures (82.7?±?13.5% vs. 99.0?±?1.7%). Using AAA, the γ values were proportional to the natural logarithm of Vair (R2?=?0.674) and inversely proportional to the natural logarithm of Vbone (R2?=?0.816). When the Vair in the targets was smaller than approximately 80?cc or the Vbone in the targets was larger than approximately 6?cc, the γ values of AAA were below 95%. Using AXB, no significant relationship was found between the γ values and Vair or Vbone. In clinical head and neck IMRT QA, greater attention should be paid to the effect of Vair and Vbone in the targets on the γ passing rates when using different dose calculation algorithms.
机译:患者特异性剂量重新计算和γ通过率分析对于强度调制放射疗法(IMRT)计划的质量保证(QA)很重要。本研究的目的是分析γ通过率与空洞(vair)和骨骼结构(Vbone)的靶体积中的γ流量(Vbone)之间的相关性。本研究招募了二十个鼻咽癌和20个鼻天然杀伤T细胞淋巴瘤患者。产生九场滑动窗口IMRT计划,基于蒙特卡罗(MC)技术,通过各向异性分析算法(AAA),ACUROS XB算法(AAAA),ACUROS XB算法(AXB)和Scimoca来计算剂量分布。在不同的算法中比较了靶标,风险,空气空腔和骨结构的靶标,器官的剂量分布和γ通过的速率。用AAA和AXB获得的γ值分别为95.6?±1.9%和96.2?±1.7%,具有3%/ 2?mm标准(p?&?0.05)。在空腔AAA和AXB之间的γ值(86.6?±9.4%vs.98.0?±1.7%)和骨结构中存在显着差异(p≤x≤0.05)。(86.6?±9.4%?1.7%)(82.7?±13.5%) vs. 99.0?±1.7%)。使用AAA,γ值与vair的自然对数成比例(R2?= 0.674),并与VBONE的天然对数成比例(R2?= 0.816)。当靶标中的vair小于约80℃或靶中的VBONE大于约6?CC时,AAA的γ值低于95%。使用AXB,在γ值和vair或Vbone之间没有发现显着关系。在临床头部和颈部IMRT QA中,在使用不同剂量计算算法时,应更加注意vair和vbone在γ通过率的靶标中的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号