首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders. >A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score
【24h】

A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score

机译:一种新的评分,用于评估流动转移处理的脑动脉瘤:4F流动导流预测得分

获取原文

摘要

Background and purpose: Although grading scales for angiography outcomes following cerebral aneurysm treatment with flow diversion have been published, physicians have not widely adopted these scales in practice. The aim of this study is to propose and validate a novel Flow diversion Predictive Score (4F-FPS) grading scale based on previously established scales that is simple and reliable. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatment for cerebral aneurysms with flow diversion between January 2014 and September 2019. The included patients were randomly divided into the derivation and validation group in a 70/30 ratio, respectively. Aneurysms were classified as incomplete or complete occlusion based on final angiography outcomes. 4F-FPS was derived to predict aneurysm occlusion from multivariate logistic regression analyses in the derivation group and validated with previously published grading scales in the validation group. Results: Overall, 662 patients [mean age, 53.8 years; 72.5% (480/662) female] with 662 aneurysms treated with the Pipeline supTM/sup flow diverter were included [69.9% (463/662) derivation group, 30.1% (199/662) validation group]. The incidence of aneurysm occlusion was 82.7%. 4F-FPS demonstrated significant discrimination in 10-fold cross validation [mean receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area, 0.862?±?0.055] and calibration (Cox & Snell R sup2/sup , 0.251; Nagelkerke R sup2/sup , 0.413) in the derivation group. The ROC area of 4F-FPS score in both the derivation and validation groups is the largest compared with previously published grading scales/scores ( p??0.05), which shows better sensitivity and specificity. The 4F-FPS score showed excellent prediction, discrimination, and calibration properties. Conclusion: The 4F-FPS score is a simple and reliable tool to predict angiography outcome after flow diversion treatment. If widely adopted, it may provide a common language to be used in future reporting of flow diversion results for clinical trials and daily practice. Clinical trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03831672
机译:背景和目的:尽管血管造影的分级尺度随着流动转移的脑动脉瘤治疗后血管造影结果已经发表,但医生在实践中没有广泛采用这些秤。本研究的目的是提出并验证基于先前建立的尺度简单可靠的新颖的流量转移预测得分(4F-FPS)分级比例。方法:我们回顾性分析了2014年1月至2019年1月至9月在2014年1月至9月期间对脑动脉瘤进行脑动脉瘤进行血管内治疗的连续患者。随机患者分别以70/30的比例随机分为衍生和验证组。基于最终血管造影结果,动脉瘤被归类为不完全或完全闭塞。衍生4F-FPS以预测来自衍生组中的多变量逻辑回归分析的动脉瘤闭塞,并在验证组中验证了先前公布的分级比例。结果:总体而言,662名患者[均值年龄,53.8岁; 72.5%(480/662)雌性]用管道处理662个动脉瘤& sup& / sup&包括流动分流者[69.9%(463/662)衍生组,30.1%(199/662)验证组]。动脉瘤闭塞的发生率为82.7%。 4F-FPS在10倍交叉验证中显示出显着的识别[均值接收器操作特性(ROC)区域,0.862?±0.055]和校准(COX&Snell R.2& / sup&,0.251; Nagelkerke R&Lt ; Sup& 2& / sup&,0.413)在衍生组中。衍生和验证组的4F-FPS评分的ROC区域是与先前公布的分级尺度/分数(P≤0.05)相比的最大值,其显示出更好的敏感性和特异性。 4F-FPS分数显示出优异的预测,辨别和校准特性。结论:4F-FPS评分是一种简单可靠的工具,可预测流动导流处理后的血管造影结果。如果广泛采用,它可能提供一种用于将来报告流动转移结果的临床试验和日常实践的报告。临床试验登记:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT03831672

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号