...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal >Comparison between cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients on hemodialysis
【24h】

Comparison between cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients on hemodialysis

机译:血液透析患者中心房颤动的冷冻消融与辐射蒸发导管消融的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Difficulties are often encountered while controlling atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Previous data revealed that cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) was not inferior to radiofrequency ablation (RFA); however, HD patients were excluded in this prior trial. Thus, the efficacy of CBA for HD patients is still unknown.METHODS:This retrospective study analyzed HD patients who underwent catheter ablation (CA) for AF from August 2011 to June 2019. Patients who received CBA (CBA group) and those who received RFA (RFA group) were compared. The primary endpoint was defined as freedom from a composite outcome (a documented recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia or a prescription of antiarrhythmic drugs) at one year after CA.RESULTS:The RFA and CBA groups were composed of 21 and 23 patients, respectively. Freedom from a composite outcome was 58.4% in the RFA group and 68.2% in the CBA group (Log-rank: p?=?0.571).CONCLUSION:Our results suggest that patients on HD with AF who were treated with CBA tended to have better outcomes than patients treated with RFA. Therefore, CBA could be a suitable ablation method for HD patients.Copyright ? 2021 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:背景:控制心房颤动(AF),特别是在血液透析(HD)患者中,通常遇到困难。以前的数据显示,用于治疗阵发性心房颤动(PAF)的冷冻剂消融(CBA)并不差不等于射频消融(RFA);然而,HD患者被排除在本前的审判中。因此,CBA对高清患者的疗效仍然是未知的。方法:这项回顾性研究分析了2011年8月至2019年6月从2011年8月到2019年6月接受了导管消融(CA)的高清患者。接受CBA(CBA组)和接受RFA的人的患者(RFA组)进行了比较。在CA.Results之后,主要终点被定义为综合结果(任何心房心律失常或抗心律失常药物的处方药物的病症或抗心律失常药物的处方)的自由度:RFA和CBA组分别由21例和23名患者组成。来自综合结果的自由在RFA组中为58.4%,CBA组中的68.2%(log-ange:p?= 0.571)。结论:我们的结果表明HD与CBA治疗的HD患者往往有比用RFA治疗的患者更好的结果。因此,CBA可以是HD患者的合适消融方法。 2021印度心脏节奏社会。 Elsevier B.V的生产和托管。保留所有权利。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号