首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Students’ view on supportive co-teaching in medical sciences: a systematic review
【24h】

Students’ view on supportive co-teaching in medical sciences: a systematic review

机译:学生对医学科学支持性专业教学的看法:系统评价

获取原文

摘要

Supportive co-teaching (SCT) is the practice of employing two or more experts whose knowledge and experiences are needed simultaneously to make a connection across different disciplines in a classroom. Although this interdisciplinary approach seems to be beneficial, there are many features which need further examination. This study was conducted to systematically review studies addressing the use of this approach and learners’ views on SCT in medical sciences. We searched for the studies addressing students’ views on SCT in medical sciences from January1st 2000 to June 31st, 2019. All the studies, both quantitative and qualitative published in English language, investigating the students’ views on SCT, in non-clinical courses in the setting of medical sciences were included. We searched electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, WHO Global Health Library, Health Systems Evidence, and ERIC with the keywords and phrases related to the topic which were: “co-teaching”, “team teaching”, “collaborative teaching”, “peer-to-peer co-teaching”, “partnership teaching”, and“ teacher collaboration”. By the initial search, 9806 studies were found and after deletion of duplicates and screening, 111 remained for selection. Upon the independent review by two researchers, we were able to discern 12 studies eligible to be included for data extraction. All the studies reported positive views of the students towards SCT although some identified concerns and drawbacks. The students stated that they could better perceive the relationship between basic and clinical sciences, were more engaged in the learning process, and their learning experience was optimized in a course directed by SCT. Overall, the students showed positive views of this approach of teaching, and their grades indicated they learned better than expected. However, mismatch and lack of coordination between instructors would make the class distracting, confusing and even disturbing. Further studies investigating different variables related to teachers and students in SCT classes are suggested.
机译:支持性共同教学(SCT)是雇用两个或多个专家的实践,其知识和经验是同时在课堂上进行不同学科的联系。虽然这种跨学科方法似乎有益,但有许多需要进一步检查的特征。该研究进行了系统地审查,解决了利用这种方法和学习者对医学科学的意见。我们搜索了从2000年1月1日至2019年1月3日至6月31日在医学科学中讨论了学生对医学科学研究的看法。所有的研究都在非临床课程中调查了学生对SCT的观点。包括医学科学的设定。我们搜索了PubMed,Scopus,Embase,Science Web的电子数据库,Who全球健康图书馆,卫生系统证据和与与主题相关的关键字和短语的eRIC:“共同教学”,“团队教学”,“协同教学“,”同行同行教学“,”伙伴关系教学“和”教师合作“。通过初始搜索,发现9806项研究,并在删除重复和筛选后,仍然选择111以进行选择。经两个研究人员的独立审查后,我们能够辨别有资格被列入数据提取的12项研究。所有研究报告了对学生对SCT的积极观点,尽管一些确定的担忧和缺点。学生们表示,他们可以更好地了解基本和临床科学之间的关系,更多地从事学习过程,他们的学习经验在SCT指导的课程中得到了优化。总体而言,学生表现出这种教学方法的积极观点,他们的成绩表明他们学会了比预期的更好。然而,教师之间的不匹配和缺乏协调会使课程分散注意力,令人困惑甚至令人不安。提出了调查与教师和学生在SCT类别相关的不同变量的进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号