首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers
【24h】

Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers

机译:攀岩特定强度和铅和巨石登山者之间的耐力的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Albeit differences in climbing-specific strength of the forearms have been demonstrated between lead and boulder climbers, little is known about the potential differences in force and power output of the upper body pulling-apparatus between disciplines. The aim of this study was to compare the climbing-specific upper-body strength and finger flexor endurance between lead and boulder climbers, as well as to examine the relative utilization of force when testing on a ledge hold compared to a jug hold. Sixteen boulder climbers (red-point climbing grade 17.9 ± 3.3) and fifteen lead climbers (red-point climbing grade 20.5 ± 3.5) performing on an advanced level volunteered for the study. Peak force, average force and rate of force development (RFD) were measured during an isometric pull-up, average velocity in dynamic pull-up, and finger flexor endurance in an intermittent test to fatigue. The isometric pull-up was performed on a ledge hold (high finger strength requirements) and on a jug hold (very low finger strength requirements). Boulder climbers demonstrated a higher maximal and explosive strength in all strength and power measurements (26.2–52.9%, ES = 0.90–1.12, p = 0.006–0.023), whereas the finger flexor endurance test showed no significant difference between the groups ( p = 0.088). Both groups were able to utilize 57–69% of peak force, average force and RFD in the ledge condition compared to the jug condition, but the relative utilization was not different between the groups ( p = 0.290–0.996). In conclusion, boulder climbers were stronger and more explosive compared to lead climbers, whereas no differences in finger flexor endurance were observed. Performing climbing-specific tests on a smaller hold appears to limit the force and power output equally between the two groups.
机译:在铅和巨石登山者之间证明了前臂的攀爬特定强度的差异,关于上身在学科之间的上身牵引装置的力和功率输出的潜在差异很少。本研究的目的是比较铅和巨石登山者之间的攀爬特异性上体强度和手指屈肌耐力,以及在与喷水器保持相比,在凸缘保持时检测力的相对利用。十六块博尔德登山者(红点攀登级别17.9±3.3)和十五升起的登山者(红点攀升级20.5±3.5)在学习中志愿的先进水平表演。在动态上拉的等距上拉起,平均速度下测量峰值力,平均力和力显影率(RFD),并且在间歇性测试中的手指屈肌耐久性疲劳。等距上拉在凸缘保持(高手指强度要求)和水壶保持(非常低的手指强度要求)上进行。博尔德登山者在所有强度和功率测量中表现出更高的最大和爆炸性强度(26.2-52.9%,ES = 0.90-1.12,P = 0.006-0.023),而手指屈肌耐久性测试在组之间没有显着差异(P = 0.088)。与水壶条件相比,两组两组能够利用57-69%的峰值力,平均力和RFD,但在组之间相对使用并不不同(P = 0.290-0.996)。总之,与铅登山者相比,博尔德登山者更强大,更爆炸,而没有观察到手指屈肌的差异。在较小的保持上执行攀爬特定的测试似乎可以在两组之间平等地限制力和功率输出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号