...
首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on Medical Education >A?layered analysis of self-explanation and structured reflection to support clinical reasoning in medical students
【24h】

A?layered analysis of self-explanation and structured reflection to support clinical reasoning in medical students

机译:a?分层分析自我解释和结构思考,以支持医学生临床推理

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Self-explanation and structured reflection have been studied independently with results suggesting that both learning interventions can effectively support medical students’ clinical reasoning development. Given this evidence, medical schools may want/begin to implement these interventions in their curricula. Implementing educational interventions requires educators to maintain the core philosophy and principles of the interventions intact while adjusting implementation techniques to the specificities of individual learning contexts. Educational scholars have yet to explicitly articulate the philosophy, principles and techniques of self-explanation and structured reflection. Without such descriptions, educators risk failing to realize self-explanation’s and structured reflection’s effect to support students’ clinical reasoning skill development in their implementations. Relying on the layered analysis approach, we articulate the philosophy, principles and techniques of self-explanation and structured reflection. This description is framed within the context of an actual implementation to illustrate the philosophies underpinning self-explanation and structured reflection, the principles that realize those philosophies, and the techniques that can be used to enact those principles. Building on the similarities between self-explanation and structured reflection, while also harnessing their differences, we identify why and how these interventions can be combined in a single implementation, while preserving their philosophies and principles. The layered analysis of self-explanation and structured reflection offers essential insights into the underpinnings of these interventions. They are articulated in this manuscript in hopes that other scholars will continue to refine these descriptions thereby facilitating effective use of self-explanation and structured reflection for clinical reasoning development.
机译:已经独立研究了自我解释和结构化反思,结果表明学习干预措施都可以有效地支持医学生的临床推理发展。鉴于这一证据,医学院可能需要/开始在课程中实施这些干预措施。实施教育干预要求教育工作者维持核心哲学和完整的核心哲学和原则,同时调整个人学习背景的特异性的实施技术。教育学者尚未明确阐明自我解释和结构性反思的哲学,原则和技术。如果没有这样的描述,教育工作者的风险无法实现自我解释和结构化反思的效果,以支持学生在其实施中的临床推理技能发展。依靠分层分析方法,我们阐述了自我解释和结构性反射的哲学,原则和技术。本说明书在实际实施的背景下框架,以说明哲学构建自我解释和结构性反思,实现这些哲学的原则以及可用于制定这些原则的技术。在自我解释和结构反射之间建立相似之处,同时也利用了他们的差异,我们确定了为什么这些干预措施如何在一个实施中组合,同时保留他们的哲学和原则。自我解释和结构反射的分层分析提供了对这些干预措施的基础的必要见解。他们在本手稿中阐述,希望其他学者将继续改进这些描述,从而促进有效利用自我解释和结构化对临床推理发展的反思。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号