...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition >Sex differences in dietary intake in British Army recruits undergoing phase one training
【24h】

Sex differences in dietary intake in British Army recruits undergoing phase one training

机译:英国陆军新兵饮食摄入的性差异,接受一阶段培训

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:British Army Phase One training exposes men and women to challenging distances of 13.5?km·d-?1 vs. 11.8?km·d-?1 and energy expenditures of ~?4000?kcal·d-?1 and ~?3000?kcal·d-?1, respectively. As such, it is essential that adequate nutrition is provided to support training demands. However, to date, there is a paucity of data on habitual dietary intake of British Army recruits. The aims of this study were to: (i) compare habitual dietary intake in British Army recruits undergoing Phase One training to Military Dietary Reference Values (MDRVs), and (ii) establish if there was a relative sex difference in dietary intake between men and women.METHOD:Researcher led weighed food records and food diaries were used to assess dietary intake in twenty-eight women (age 21.4?±?3.0?yrs., height: 163.7?±?5.0?cm, body mass 65.0?±?6.7?kg), and seventeen men (age 20.4?±?2.3?yrs., height: 178.0?±?7.9?cm, body mass 74.6?±?8.1?kg) at the Army Training Centre, Pirbright for 8-days in week ten of training. Macro and micronutrient content were estimated using dietary analysis software (Nutritics, Dublin) and assessed via an independent sample t-test to establish if there was a sex difference in daily energy, macro or micronutrient intakes.RESULTS:Estimated daily energy intake was less than the MDRV for both men and women, with men consuming a greater amount of energy compared with women (2846?±?573 vs. 2207?±?585?kcal·day-?1, p??0.001). Both sexes under consumed carbohydrate (CHO) when data was expressed relative to body mass with men consuming a greater amount than women (4.8?±?1.3 vs. 3.8?±?1.4?g·kg-?1·day-?1, p?=?0.025, ES?=?0.74). Both sexes also failed to meet MDRVs for protein intake with men consuming more than women (1.5?±?0.3 vs. 1.3?±?0.3?g·kg-?1·day-?1?0.030, ES?=?0.67). There were no differences in dietary fat intake between men and women (1.5?±?0.2 vs. 1.5?±?0.5?g·kg-?1·day-?1, p?=?0.483, ES?=?0.00).CONCLUSIONS:Daily EI in men and women in Phase One training does not meet MDRVs. Interventions to increase macronutrient intakes should be considered along with research investigating the potential benefits for increasing different macronutrient intakes on training adaptations.
机译:背景:英国陆军阶段一项培训公开了男女,以挑战13.5的距离为13.5?米·d-?1与11.8?km·d-?1和能量支出的〜?4000?kcal·d-?1和〜? 3000?kcal·d-?1分别。因此,必须提供足够的营养来支持培训需求。然而,迄今为止,有缺乏关于英国陆军招募习惯性饮食摄入的数据。本研究的目的是:(i)比较英国陆军招募的习惯性饮食摄入,接受一阶段培训的军事膳食参考价值观(MDRV),(ii)建立男性之间饮食摄入的相对性别差异。女性。研究人员LED称重食物记录和食物日记用于评估二十八名女性的膳食摄入量(21.4岁?±3.0?3.0?YRS。,高度:163.7?±5.0?cm,体重65.0?± 6.7?kg)和17名男子(20.4岁?±2.3?YRS。,身高:178.0?±7.9?cm,体重74.6?±8.1 kg)在陆军训练中心,黎巴基队8天在十年的培训中。使用膳食分析软件(Nutritics,Dublin)估计宏观和微量营养素含量,并通过独立样本的T检验评估,建立日常能量,宏观或微量营养素的性别差异。结果:估计日常能量摄入量小于男性和女性的MDRV,与女性相比,男性消耗更大的能量(2846?±573 vs.2207?±585?kcal·日 - ?1,p?<0.001)。在消耗的碳水化合物(CHO)下的性别,当数据相对于体重时,男性的群体表达比女性更大的人(4.8?±1.3与3.8?±1.4?1·日 - ?1, p?=?0.025,ES?=?0.74)。两性也未能满足MDRV的蛋白质摄入与女性的蛋白质摄入量超过女性(1.5?±0.3°......±0.3?0.3?kg-?1·日 - ?1?0.030,es?= 0.67) 。男性和女性之间的膳食脂肪摄入没有差异(1.5?±0.2与1.5?±0.5?G·kg-?1·日 - ?1,p?=?0.483,ES?=?0.00) .Conclusions:阶段的男性和女性的日常ei培训不符合MDRV。应考虑加剧Macronurient摄入量的干预研究,研究调查增加不同Macronutrient摄入量的潜在益处在培训适应上的潜在益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号