...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hematology and Oncology >Comparison of matched sibling donors versus unrelated donors in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a study on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT
【24h】

Comparison of matched sibling donors versus unrelated donors in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a study on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

机译:匹配兄弟供体与非相关供体在同种异体干细胞移植中对初级难治性急性髓性白血病的比较:代表EBMT急性白血病工作组的研究

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundPrimary refractory acute myeloid leukemia (PRF-AML) is associated with a dismal prognosis. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in active disease is an alternative therapeutic strategy. The increased availability of unrelated donors together with the significant reduction in transplant-related mortality in recent years have opened the possibility for transplantation to a larger number of patients with PRF-AML. Moreover, transplant from unrelated donors may be associated with stronger graft-mediated anti-leukemic effect in comparison to transplantations from HLA-matched sibling donor, which may be of importance in the setting of PRF-AML. MethodsThe current study aimed to address the issue of HSCT for PRF-AML and to compare the outcomes of HSCT from matched sibling donors ( n =?660) versus unrelated donors ( n =?381), for patients with PRF-AML between 2000 and 2013. The Kaplan-Meier estimator, the cumulative incidence function, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used where appropriate. ResultsHSCT provide patients with PRF-AML a 2-year leukemia-free survival and overall survival of about 25 and 30%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, two predictive factors, cytogenetics and time from diagnosis to transplant, were associated with lower leukemia-free survival, whereas Karnofsky performance status at transplant ≥90% was associated with better leukemia-free survival (LFS). Concerning relapse incidence, cytogenetics and time from diagnosis to transplant were associated with increased relapse. Reduced intensity conditioning regimen was the only factor associated with lower non-relapse mortality. ConclusionsHSCT was able to rescue about one quarter of the patients with PRF-AML. The donor type did not have any impact on PRF patients’ outcomes. In contrast, time to transplant was a major prognostic factor for LFS. For patients with PRF-AML who do not have a matched sibling donor, HSCT from an unrelated donor is a suitable option, and therefore, initiation of an early search for allocating a suitable donor is indicated.
机译:背景令人难以耐火急性髓性白血病(PRF-AML)与令人沮丧的预后有关。在活性疾病中的同种异体干细胞移植(HSCT)是替代治疗策略。近年来,无关的捐助者的可用性随着移植相关死亡率的显着降低,已经开辟了移植到更多患有PRF-AML患者的可能性。此外,与HLA匹配的兄弟供体的移植相比,来自无关供体的移植可能与较强的接枝介导的抗白血病效果相关,这可能在PRF-AML的设置中具有重要性。方法目前的研究旨在解决PRF-AML的HSCT问题,并比较来自匹配的兄弟供体(n =Δ660)的HSCT的结果与2000年和2000年之间的PRF-AML患者的不相关的供体(n =?381)。 2013年,在适当的情况下使用了Kaplan-Meier估算器,累积发电功能和Cox比例危险回归模型。结果水分为患有PRF-AML的患者,分别为2年的白血病存活和总生存率分别为约25%和30%。在多变量分析中,两种预测因素,细胞遗传学和从诊断到移植的时间,与较低的无白血病存活相关,而移植率的Karnofsky性能状况≥90%与更好的无白血病存活(LFS)相关。关于复发发生率,细胞遗传学和从诊断到移植的时间与复发增加有关。降低的强度调理方案是与较低的非复发性死亡率相关的唯一因素。结论HSCT能够拯救PRF-AML患者的四分之一。捐赠者类型对PRF患者的结果没有任何影响。相反,移植时间是LFS的主要预后因素。对于不具有匹配的兄弟供体的PRF-AML的患者,来自无关的供体的HSCT是合适的选择,因此指出了对分配合适供体的早期搜查的启动。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号