首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Education Development >Identifying the factors explaining the quality of scientific functions in the university Based on Glassick six-component approach
【24h】

Identifying the factors explaining the quality of scientific functions in the university Based on Glassick six-component approach

机译:基于杯子六分方式确定了解释大学科学职能质量的因素

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Objective: Paying attention to the quality of academic activities has always been one of the major challenges for universities. In this study, the factors explaining the quality of scientific functions based on the Glassic six-component approach are investigated. Method: The Mixed method was used in this research with qualitative-quantitative approach with deductive content analysis. In the qualitative section, using in-depth and semi-structured interview tools, 20 experts in the field of medical sciences, humanities, basic sciences and engineering were interviewed and until saturation continued. The data were analyzed using content analysis based on Glassic six-component model. The face and content validity of the questionnaire were evaluated by five expertschr('39') view point. 300 faculty members from two universities of Shiraz University, and Shiraz University of Medical Sciences were administered and 265 questionnaires were returned. The reliability of questionnaire was confirmed by Cronbachchr('39')s alpha 96%. The Exploratory and Confirmatory factor analysis were analyzed by Spss 22 and LISREL. Results: in content analysis, 153 codes were extracted. they were summarized and categorizing into 6 main categories, 13 middle components and 29 items. based on factor analyzing, The main factor in explaining quality was chr('39')Knowledge Sharingchr('39') items. Conclusion: It seems that formal mechanisms such as legal frameworks, regulations, evaluation and promotion system, external incentives are needed as the first requirements for the development of scientific functions, but the reliability of quality criteria are effected by hidden factors such as trust, interaction and Commitment.
机译:背景和目标:关注学术活动的质量一直是大学的主要挑战之一。在这项研究中,研究了解释基于玻璃六组成方法的科学函数质量的因素。方法:使用Deptuctive Contential分析,使用了与定性定量方法进行了混合方法。在定性部分,采用深入和半结构化的面试工具,采访了医学科学,人文基础科学和工程领域的20个专家,直到饱和度继续。基于玻璃六组件模型的内容分析分析了数据。调查问卷的面部和内容有效期由五位专家('39')观点评估。来自Shiraz University的两个大学的300名教师,Shiraz医学院进行了管理,并返回265份问卷。 Cronbachchr('39')的Alpha 96%确认了问卷的可靠性。 SPSS 22和Lisrel分析了探索性和验证因子分析。结果:在内容分析中,提取153个代码。他们总结并分为6个主要类别,13个中间组分和29项。基于因子分析,解释质量的主要因素是CHR('39')知识共享CHR('39')项目。结论:似乎是法律框架,法规,评价和促进系统等正式机制,需要作为科学职能发展的第一个要求,但质量标准的可靠性是通过信任,互动等隐藏因素实现的和承诺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号