...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences >Results Comparison for Hat-shaped, Double-notch and Punch Testing of Split Hopkinson Shear Bar Technique
【24h】

Results Comparison for Hat-shaped, Double-notch and Punch Testing of Split Hopkinson Shear Bar Technique

机译:结果帽子型,双缺口和冲压试验的果实剪切条技术比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The split Hopkinson shear bar (SHSB) test is a modification of the high rate-impact test using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). The SHSB has been developed for a variety of techniques, for example, the hat-shaped (circular or flat), double-notch, and punch (with or without notch) techniques. The main purpose of this study was to compare these three techniques to determine the shear stress-shear strain of aluminum alloy 2024-T351. The study was conducted using the Abaqus/CAE? software. The circular hat-shaped and punch (with and without notch) techniques used a quarter-section solid 3D model. The flat hat-shaped and double-notch techniques used a half-section solid 3D model. This study successfully tested and compared the three SHSB techniques, with a number of considerations, i.e. the same parameter values for kinetic energy, shear area and shear angle. Each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages in terms of force equilibrium, flow stress fluctuation, constant strain rate, machine-ability, ease of experiment, etc. The optimum technique among the three is the hat-shaped technique.
机译:拆分霍普金森剪切条(SHSB)测试是使用分裂霍普金森压力棒(SHPB)进行高速率冲击试验的修改。已经开发了SHSB,用于各种技术,例如,帽形(圆形或平坦),双凹口和冲头(有或没有缺口)技术。本研究的主要目的是比较这三种技术来确定铝合金2024-T351的剪切应力 - 剪切菌株。使用ABAQUS / CAE进行该研究?软件。圆形帽子形和打孔(有和没有缺口)技术使用四分之一段实体3D模型。扁平帽形和双缺口技术使用了半剖面实体3D模型。该研究成功测试并比较了三种SHSB技术,具有许多考虑因素,即动能,剪切区域和剪切角的相同参数值。每种技术在力平衡,流量压力波动,恒定应变率,机器能力,实验方便等方面都有自己的优点和缺点。三种是帽形技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号