首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy >Revitalizing Scholarship on Academic Collective Bargaining
【24h】

Revitalizing Scholarship on Academic Collective Bargaining

机译:振兴学术集体谈判的奖学金

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Research on unions in academe began in the 1960s and 1970s. It continued in the 1980s as greater numbers of faculty organized but then declined in the 1990s, with the exception of a small group of scholars who continue to study and comment on labor management relations in post-secondary education. Many prognostications, originally put forward in the 1970s and 1980s, remain unexamined. The last two decades in particular, have seen less attention focused on unions in academe. Organizing efforts continue to be robust, and advocates from all vantage points continue to offer arguments both in favor or against collective bargaining. Yet we really know very little about the impact unions have on academic organizations. Much of what is said about the outcomes remain unsubstantiated in peer reviewed journals or other “non-advocate” scholarly work. In fact, there are few objective and defensible research studies to substantiate many claims made by those opposed to or supportive of collective bargaining, particularly when viewing the wider institutional landscape.
机译:1960年代和20世纪70年代开始的学术界工会研究。它在20世纪80年代持续了大量的教师组织,但在20世纪90年代拒绝,除了一小组学者们继续学习和评述后院后教育中的劳动管理关系。许多预测,最初提出在20世纪70年代和20世纪80年代,仍未审视。最后二十年来,已经看不到学术界的联盟的关注。组织努力继续强劲,所有有利地点的倡导者继续提供赞成或反对集体谈判的论据。然而,我们对学术组织的影响几乎没有了解。关于结果的许多人在同行评审期刊或其他“非倡导者”学术工作中仍然未经证实。事实上,有很少有客观和可辩护的研究研究,以证实由反对或支持集体谈判的人提出的许多索赔,特别是在观察更广泛的制度景观时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号