...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of advanced transportation >Driving Simulator Validity of Driving Behavior in Work Zones
【24h】

Driving Simulator Validity of Driving Behavior in Work Zones

机译:在工作区中驾驶驾驶行为的模拟器有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

Driving simulation is an efficient, safe, and data-collection-friendly method to examine driving behavior in a controlled environment. However, the validity of a driving simulator is inconsistent when the type of the driving simulator or the driving scenario is different. The purpose of this research is to verify driving simulator validity in driving behavior research in work zones. A field experiment and a corresponding simulation experiment were conducted to collect behavioral data. Indicators such as speed, car-following distance, and reaction delay time were chosen to examine the absolute and relative validity of the driving simulator. In particular, a survival analysis method was proposed in this research to examine the validity of reaction delay time. The result indicates the following: (1) most indicators are valid in driving behavior research in the work zone. For example, spot speed, car-following distance, headway, and reaction delay time show absolute validity. (2) Standard deviation of the car-following distance shows relative validity. Consistent with previous researches, some driving behaviors appear to be more aggressive in the simulation environment.
机译:驾驶仿真是一种有效,安全,数据采集的友好方法,用于检查受控环境中的驾驶行为。然而,当驾驶模拟器或驾驶场景的类型不同时,驾驶模拟器的有效性是不一致的。本研究的目的是验证在工作区的驾驶行为研究方面探讨驾驶模拟器有效性。进行现场实验和相应的仿真实验以收集行为数据。选择速度,汽车跟踪距离和反应延迟时间等指示器,以检查驾驶模拟器的绝对和相对有效性。特别地,在该研究中提出了一种存活分析方法,以检查反应延迟时间的有效性。结果表明以下内容:(1)大多数指标对于工作区的行为研究有效。例如,点速度,距离距离,偏路和反应延迟时间显示绝对有效性。 (2)汽车后距离的标准偏差显示相对有效性。与以前的研究一致,一些驾驶行为在模拟环境中似乎更具侵略性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号