首页> 外文期刊>JMIR mHealth and uHealth >Android and iPhone Mobile Apps for Psychosocial Wellness and Stress Management: Systematic Search in App Stores and Literature Review
【24h】

Android and iPhone Mobile Apps for Psychosocial Wellness and Stress Management: Systematic Search in App Stores and Literature Review

机译:Android和iPhone移动应用程序进行心理社会健康和压力管理:应用商店中的系统搜索和文献综述

获取原文

摘要

Background In an oversaturated market of publicly available mobile apps for psychosocial self-care and stress management, health care providers, patients, and consumers interested in mental health–related apps may wonder which, if any, are efficacious. Readily available metrics for consumers include user popularity and media buzz rather than scientific evidence. Objective This systematic review aimed to (1) examine the breadth of therapeutic contents and features of psychosocial wellness and stress management apps available to self-help seekers for public download and (2) determine which of these apps have original research support. Methods First, we conducted a systematic review of publicly available apps on the iPhone App Store (Apple Inc) and Android Google Play (Google LLC) platforms using conventional self-help-seeking search terms related to wellness and stress. The results were limited to English-language apps available for free download. In total, 2 reviewers independently evaluated all apps and discussed the findings to reach 100% consensus regarding inclusion. Second, a literature review was conducted on the included apps to identify supporting studies with original data collection. Results We screened 3287 apps and found 1009 psychosocial wellness and stress management apps. Content varied widely. The most common evidence-based strategy was mindfulness-meditation, followed by positive psychology and goal setting. Most apps were intended to be used as self-help interventions, with only 1.09% (11/1009) involving an electronic therapist and 1.88% (19/1009) designed as a supplement to in-person psychotherapy. Only 4.66% (47/1009) of apps targeted individuals with psychological disorders, and less than 1% of apps (6/1009, 0.59%) targeted individuals with other chronic illnesses. Approximately 2% (21/1009, 2.08%) were supported by original research publications, with a total of 25 efficacy studies and 10 feasibility studies. The Headspace mindfulness app had the most evidence, including 8 efficacy studies. Most other scientifically backed apps were supported by a single feasibility or efficacy study. Conclusions Only 2.08% (21/1009) of publicly available psychosocial wellness and stress management mobile apps discoverable to self-help seekers have published, peer-reviewed evidence of feasibility and/or efficacy. Clinicians and investigators may use these findings to help patients and families navigate the volume of emerging digital health interventions for stress management and wellness.
机译:背景技术在对心理社会自我保健和压力管理,医疗保健提供者,患者和对心理健康相关的应用感兴趣的消费者的过饱和市场的背景可能会令人害怕哪些,如果有的话,是有效的。随时可获得的消费者指标包括用户人气和媒体嗡嗡声,而不是科学证据。目的这一系统审查旨在(1)审查自助寻求公共下载的自助寻求者可用的心理社会健康和压力管理应用程序的宽度和特征,并确定这些应用程序有哪些原创研究支持。方法首先,我们对iPhone App Store(Apple Inc)和Android Google Play(Google LLC)平台进行了系统审查,使用与健康和压力相关的传统自助寻求搜索条件。结果仅限于可免费下载的英语应用程序。共有2名审阅员独立评估所有应用,并讨论了达到纳入100%共识的调查结果。其次,在附带的应用程序上进行了文献综述,以确定使用原始数据收集的支持研究。结果我们浏览了3287个应用程序,并发现了1009个心理社会健康和压力管理应用程序。内容广泛变化。最常见的循证战略是思想 - 冥想,其次是积极的心理学和目标设置。大多数应用程序旨在用作自助干预措施,只有1.09%(11/1009),涉及电子治疗师和1.88%(19/1009),设计为对亲人的心理治疗。仅4.66%(47/1009)的应用程序针对性患有心理障碍的个人,少于1%的应用(6/1009,0.59%)针对性慢性疾病的靶向个体。大约2%(21/1009,2.08%)由原始研究出版物支持,共有25个疗效研究和10项可行性研究。标题态度应用具有最多的证据,包括8项疗效研究。大多数其他科学支持的应用程序得到了单一可行性或疗效研究的支持。结论只有2.08%(21/1009)公开的心理社会健康和压力管理移动应用程序可发现,可自助寻求者发表,同行评审的可行性和/或疗效证据。临床医生和调查人员可以使用这些调查结果来帮助患者和家庭导航新兴数字健康干预措施的压力管理和健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号